Lumbar Spinal Procedures - CAM 161

Description
Operative treatment is indicated when the natural history of surgically treated lesions is better than the natural history for non-operatively treated lesions. All operative interventions must be based on a positive correlation with clinical findings, the natural history of the disease, the clinical course, and diagnostic tests or imaging results. All individuals being considered for surgical intervention should receive a comprehensive neuromusculoskeletal examination to identify pain generators that may either respond to non-surgical techniques or may be refractory to surgical intervention.

Aggressive surgical approaches to fusion may be an indication for denial of cases (when such techniques have not been demonstrated to be superior to less morbid techniques) or recommendation for alternative procedure. Because of variable outcomes with fusion surgery, individuals should be actively involved in the decision-making process and provided appropriate decision-support materials explaining potential risks/benefits and treatment alternatives when considering this intervention.

General Information

  • It is an expectation that all patients receive care/services from a licensed clinician. All appropriate supporting documentation, including recent pertinent office visit notes, laboratory data, and results of any special testing must be provided. If applicable: All prior relevant imaging results and the reason that alternative imaging cannot be performed must be included in the documentation submitted.
  • The guideline criteria in the following sections were developed utilizing evidence-based and peer-reviewed resources from medical publications and societal organization guidelines as well as from widely accepted standard of care, best practice recommendations.

Purpose
This guideline outlines the key surgical treatments and indications for common lumbar spinal disorders and is a consensus document based upon the best available evidence. Spine surgery is a complex area of medicine, and this document breaks out the clinical indications by surgical type.

This guideline does not address spinal deformity surgeries or the clinical indications for spinal deformity surgery.

Scope
Spinal surgeries should be performed only by those with extensive and specialized surgical training (neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery). Choice of surgical approach is based on anatomy, pathology, and the surgeon's experience and preference.

Instrumentation, bone formation or grafting materials, including biologics, should be used at the surgeon’s discretion; however, use should be limited to FDA approved indications regarding the specific devices or biologics.

Special Note
In order for surgeries to be considered medically necessary there must be clear medical records that demonstrate a clear surgical plan that matches the request for surgery.

Policy
INDICATIONS
Lumbar Discectomy/Microdiscectomy (1,2)
Surgical Indications

  • When ALL of the following are present:
    • Primary radicular symptoms noted upon clinical exam that significantly hinders daily activities  
    • Failure of conservative treatment* for a minimum of six (6) weeks within the last six (6) months;

NOTE - Failure of conservative treatment is defined as one of the following:

      • Lack of meaningful improvement after a full course of treatment; OR
      • Progression or worsening of symptoms during treatment; OR
      • Documentation of a medical reason the member is unable to participate in treatment

Closure of medical or therapy offices, patient inconvenience, or noncompliance without explanation does not constitute “inability to complete” treatment.

    • Imaging studies showing evidence of inter-vertebral disc herniation that correlate exactly with the individual’s symptoms/signs

Other Indications 

Microdiscectomy may be used as the first line of treatment (no conservative treatment required) in the following clinical scenarios:

  • Progressive nerve compression resulting in an acute neurologic deficit (motor) due to herniated disc. The neurological deficits should be significant: 0-2/5 on the motor function scale for L5 or S1 roots OR 0-3/5 for L3 or L4 roots. Lesser degrees of motor dysfunction may resolve with conservative treatment and are not considered an indication for early surgery
  • Cauda equina syndrome

Lumbar Decompression (1–4)
Laminectomy, Laminotomy, Facetectomy, and Foraminotomy
Surgical Indications

  • When ALL of the following are present:
    • Neurogenic claudication, and/or radicular leg pain that impairs daily activities  
    • Failure of conservative treatment* for a minimum of six (6) weeks within the last six (6) months;

NOTE - Failure of conservative treatment is defined as one of the following:

      • Lack of meaningful improvement after a full course of treatment; OR
      • Progression or worsening of symptoms during treatment; OR
      • Documentation of a medical reason the member is unable to participate in treatment

Closure of medical or therapy offices, patient inconvenience, or noncompliance without explanation does not constitute “inability to complete” treatment.

    • Imaging studies demonstrating moderate to severe stenosis consistent with clinical signs/symptoms

Other Indications 
Lumbar decompression may be used as the first line of treatment (no conservative treatment required) in any of the following clinical scenarios:

  • Progressive nerve compression resulting in an acute neurologic (motor) deficit. The neurological deficits should be significant: 0-2/5 on the motor function scale for L5 or S1 roots OR 0-3/5 for L3 or L4 roots. Lesser degrees of motor dysfunction may resolve with conservative treatment and are not considered an indication for early surgery
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Spinal stenosis due to tumor, infection, or trauma

Lumbar Spine Fusion (1,3–8)
Single Level Fusion With or Without Decompression
Surgical Indications

  • When ALL of the following are present:
    • Lumbar back pain, neurogenic claudication, and/or radicular leg pain without sensory or motor deficit that impairs daily activities for at least 6 months
    • Failure of conservative treatment* for a minimum of six (6) weeks within the last six (6) months;

NOTE - Failure of conservative treatment is defined as one of the following:

      • Lack of meaningful improvement after a full course of treatment; OR
      • Progression or worsening of symptoms during treatment; OR
      • Documentation of a medical reason the member is unable to participate in treatment

Closure of medical or therapy offices, patient inconvenience, or noncompliance without explanation does not constitute “inability to complete” treatment.

    • Imaging studies corresponding to the clinical findings
    • At least ONE of the following clinical conditions:
      • Spondylolisthesis (neural arch defect - spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and congenital unilateral neural arch hypoplasia)
      • Evidence of segmental instability - Excessive motion, as in degenerative spondylolisthesis, segmental instability, and surgically induced segmental instability
      • Revision surgery for failed previous operation(s) for pseudoarthrosis at the same level at least 9-12 months from prior surgery if significant functional gains are anticipated
      • Revision surgery for failed previous operation(s) repeat disk herniations if significant functional gains are anticipated
        • Note: Many recurrent disc herniations can be treated with discectomy alone, so specific indications for the addition of fusion will be required
      • Fusion for the treatment of spinal tumor, cancer, or infection
      • Chronic low back pain or degenerative disc disease (disc degeneration without significant neurological compression presenting with low back pain) must have failed at least 6 months of appropriate active non-operative treatment (completion of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation program is mandatory) and must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis (9)

NOTE: The results of several randomized trials suggest that in many degenerative cases un-instrumented posterolateral intertransverse fusion has similar results to larger instrumented (PLIF, TLIF, etc.) fusion techniques with fewer morbidities and less likelihood of revision surgery. Accordingly, specific findings suggesting more significant instability should be present when larger techniques are used (gaping of facets, gross motion on flexion/extension radiographs, wide disc spaces) (7,10)
Other Indications 
Lumbar spinal fusion may be used as the first line of treatment (no conservative treatment required) in the following clinical scenarios (1) :

  • Progressive nerve compression resulting in an acute neurologic deficit (motor) AND  
    • One of the aforementioned clinical conditions, except chronic low back pain or degenerative disc disease. The neurological deficits must be significant: 0-2/5 on the motor function scale for L5 or S1 roots OR 0-3/5 for L3 or L4 roots. Lesser degrees of motor dysfunction may resolve with conservative treatment and are not considered an indication for early surgery.
  • Cauda equina syndrome AND 
    • One of the aforementioned clinical conditions, except chronic low back pain or degenerative disc disease

Multi-Level Fusion With or Without Decompression
Surgical Indications

  • When ALL of the following are present:
    • Lumbar back pain with neurogenic claudication, and/or radicular leg pain without sensory or motor deficit that impairs daily activities for at least 6 months
      • NOTE: Axial low back pain alone is a contraindication for multi-level lumbar fusion with or without decompression
    • Failure of conservative treatment* for a minimum of six (6) weeks within the last six (6) months;

NOTE - Failure of conservative treatment is defined as one of the following:

      • Lack of meaningful improvement after a full course of treatment; OR
      • Progression or worsening of symptoms during treatment; OR
      • Documentation of a medical reason the member is unable to participate in treatment

Closure of medical or therapy offices, patient inconvenience, or noncompliance without explanation does not constitute “inability to complete” treatment.

    • Imaging studies corresponding to the clinical findings
    • At least ONE of the following clinical conditions:
      • Multiple level spondylolisthesis
        • Note: Fusions in cases with single level spondylolisthesis should be limited to the unstable level
      • Fusion for the treatment of spinal tumor, trauma, cancer, or infection affecting multiple levels
      • Intra-operative segmental instability

Other Indications 
Lumbar spinal fusion may be used as the first line of treatment (no conservative treatment required) in the following clinical scenarios (1) :

  • Progressive nerve compression resulting in an acute neurologic deficit (motor) AND
    • One of the aforementioned clinical conditions except chronic low back pain or degenerative disc disease. The neurological deficits must be significant: 0-2/5 on the motor function scale for L5 or S1 roots OR 0-3/5 for L3 or L4 roots. Lesser degrees of motor dysfunction may resolve with appropriate conservative treatment and are not considered an indication for early surgery
  • Cauda equina syndrome AND
    • One of the aforementioned clinical conditions, except chronic low back pain or degenerative disc disease

Repeat Lumbar Spine Fusion Operations
Repeat lumbar fusion operations will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis upon submission of medical records and imaging studies that demonstrate remediable pathology. The below must also be documented and available for review of repeat fusion requests:  

  • Rationale as to why surgery is preferred over other non-invasive or less invasive treatment procedures
  • Signed documentation that the individual has participated in the decision-making process and understands the high rate of failure/complications
  • For surgery for pseudarthrosis in the lumbar spine, ALL of the following criteria must be met (11–13) :
    • Mechanical low back pain that is approximately at the level of the pseudarthrosis, qualified as pain that can be somewhat positionally abated
    • A period of time following the index surgery during which the patient had symptomatic relief
    • Presence of symptoms for at least 6 months
    • Failure of nonoperative treatment for at least 3 months
      • The medical record must clearly reflect which conservative treatments the patient has tried or is not a candidate for and why, including medical therapies, physical and exercise therapies and injections
    • CT or plain films that are highly suggestive of nonunion at a lumbar segment at which a fusion had been previously attempted. These criteria can include 1 or more of the following:
      • Lack of bridging bone after 12 months from the index surgery
      • Dynamic motion noted on flexion-extension radiographs
      • Pedicle screw breakage
      • Screw loosening
      • Curve/correction decompensation

Relative Contraindications for Spine Surgery (14–18)
NOTE: Cases may not be approved if the below contraindications exist:

  • Medical contraindications to surgery: Such as infection of soft tissue adjacent to the spine and may be at risk for spreading to the spine; severe cardiopulmonary disease; anemia; malnutrition, systemic infection, and elevated blood sugar (19)
  • Psychosocial risk factors. It is imperative to rule out non-physiologic modifiers of pain presentation or non-operative conditions mimicking radiculopathy or instability (such as peripheral neuropathy, piriformis syndrome, myofascial pain, sympathetically mediated pain syndromes, sacroiliac dysfunction, psychological conditions, etc.) prior to consideration of elective surgical intervention. (1,19) Individuals with clinically significant depression or other psychiatric disorders being considered for elective spine surgery will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and the surgery may be denied for risk of failure.
  • Active Tobacco or Nicotine use prior to fusion surgery: Individuals must be free from smoking and/or nicotine use for at least six weeks prior to surgery and during the entire period of fusion healing. Cessation must be confirmed by a negative cotinine test prior to surgery approval. (20,21)
  • Morbid Obesity: Contraindication to surgery in cases where there is significant risk and concern for improper post-operative healing, post-operative complications related to morbid obesity, and/or an inability to participate in post-operative rehabilitation. (22,23) These cases will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and may be denied given the risk of failure.

Non-Covered Procedures

  • Percutaneous lumbar discectomy
  • Radiofrequency disc decompression
  • Percutaneous decompressions
  • Laser discectomy
  • Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty (IDEA) or more commonly called IDET (intradiscal electrothermal therapy)
  • Nucleus pulpous replacement
  • Pre-sacral fusion

BACKGROUND
Definitions

Lumbar Discectomy/Microdiscectomy is a surgical procedure to remove part of the damaged spinal disc. The damaged spinal disc herniates into the spinal canal and compresses the nerve roots. Nerve root compression leads to symptoms like low back pain, radicular pain, numbness and tingling, muscular weakness, and paresthesia. Typical disc herniation pain is exacerbated with any movement that causes the disc to increase pressure on the nerve roots.

Lumbar Decompression (Laminectomy, Laminotomy, Facetectomy, and Foraminotomy): Laminectomy is a common decompression surgery. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons defines laminectomy as a surgery to remove the back part of vertebra, lamina, to create more space for the spinal cord and nerves. The most common indication for laminectomy is spinal stenosis. Spondylolisthesis and herniated disk are also frequent indications for laminectomy. Decompression surgery is usually performed as part of lumbar fusion surgery.

Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Lumbar spinal fusion (arthrodesis) is a surgical procedure used to treat spinal conditions of the lumbar, e.g., degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, injuries/fractures of the spine, spinal instability, and spondylolisthesis. Spinal fusion is a “welding” process that permanently fuses or joins together two or more adjacent bones in the spine, immobilizing the vertebrae and restricting motion at a painful joint. It is usually performed after other surgical procedures of the spine, such as discectomy or laminectomy. The goal of fusion is to increase spinal stability, reduce irritation of the affected nerve roots, compression on the spinal cord, disability, and pain and/or numbness. Clinical criteria for single level fusion versus multiple level fusions are outlined under the indications section.

Isolated Low Back Pain: Pain isolated to the lumbar region of the spine and the surrounding paraspinal musculature. Also referred to ‘mechanical low back pain’ or ‘discogenic pain.’ No associated neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy.

*Conservative Treatment
Non-operative conservative treatment should include a multimodality approach consisting of at least one (1) active and one (1) inactive component targeting the affected spinal region.

  • Active Modalities
    • Physical therapy
    • Physician-supervised home exercise program (HEP)**
    • Chiropractic Care
  • Inactive Modalities
    • Medications (e.g., NSAIDs, steroids, analgesics)
    • Injections (e.g., epidural steroid injection, selective nerve root block)
    • Medical devices (e.g., TENS unit, bracing)

**Home Exercise Program (HEP)
The following two elements are required to meet conservative therapy guidelines for HEP:

  • Documentation of an exercise prescription/plan provided by a physician, physical therapist, or chiropractor; AND
  • Follow-up documentation regarding completion of HEP after the required 6-week timeframe or inability to complete HEP due to a documented medical reason (i.e., increased pain or inability to physically perform exercises)

Rationale
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE
Surgical interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis(4)

  • Study Design: This study is a systematic review with a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing various surgical interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
  • Target Population: The study included participants aged 40 years or older with a diagnosis of degenerative LSS, excluding those with malignancy, trauma, vertebral fracture, infection, and inflammatory disease.
  • Key Factors: The primary outcome for effectiveness was physical function, and secondary outcomes included the intensity of back pain and leg pain. The study included 43 RCTs involving 5017 participants for the systematic review and 28 RCTs for the network meta-analysis. The study found that endoscopic-assisted laminotomy may be the safest and most effective intervention for improving physical function in adults with degenerative LSS.

Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials(3)

  • Study Design: This study is a systematic review with a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).
  • Target Population: The study included adult participants with DS, excluding those with isthmic spondylolisthesis, degenerative scoliosis, spinal stenosis with other causes, or those with previous spinal surgery.
  • Key Factors: The primary outcomes were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back pain, and leg pain. Secondary outcomes included reoperation rate, complication rate, length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, blood loss during surgery, and quality of life. The study included four trials with 523 participants and found that adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial differences in disability, pain, and quality of life at a 2-year follow-up. The study concluded that isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients with DS.

Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials(7)

  • Study Design: This study is a network meta-analysis of RCTs comparing different lumbar fusion techniques in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
  • Target Population: The study included patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with various lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) techniques.
  • Key Factors: The primary outcomes were fusion rate and overall adverse event rate. Secondary outcomes included operative time, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and pain score. The study included 15 RCTs with 992 patients and found that circumferential fusion led to a significantly higher fusion rate than other techniques. The study concluded that circumferential fusion might be recommended due to its balance between fusion rate and overall adverse event rate

ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE
Shared Findings(3,4,7):

  • All three studies emphasize the importance of evaluating different surgical techniques for spinal conditions.
  • They all highlight the need for careful consideration of patient-specific factors when choosing the appropriate surgical intervention.
  • The studies agree that minimally invasive techniques can offer benefits in terms of safety and effectiveness.

Differing Findings:

  • Chen et al. 2024(4) focuses on the effectiveness of endoscopic-assisted laminotomy for LSS, suggesting it as the safest and most effective option.
  • Kaiser et al. 2023(3) concludes that isolated decompression is generally sufficient for most patients with DS, questioning the added benefits of fusion.
  • Kang et al. 2022(7) finds that circumferential fusion offers the best balance between fusion rate and adverse event rate, recommending it for lumbar spondylolisthesis management.

Conclusion
In summary, while all three studies provide valuable insights into the treatment of spinal conditions, they each emphasize different surgical techniques and outcomes. Chen et al. 2024(4) highlights the benefits of endoscopic-assisted laminotomy for LSS, Kaiser et al. 2023(3) supports isolated decompression for DS, and Kang et al. 2022(7) recommends circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.

References

  1. North American Spine Society. Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy. NASS. Published online 2012. doi:https://www.spine.org/Portals/0/Assets/Downloads/ResearchClinicalCare/Guidelines/LumbarDiscHerniation.pdf
  2. Li Y, Fredrickson V, Resnick DK. How Should We Grade Lumbar Disc Herniation and Nerve Root Compression? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(6):1896-1902. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3674-y
  3. Kaiser R, Kantorová L, Langaufová A, et al. Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023;94(8):657-666. doi:10.1136/jnnp- 2022-330158
  4. Chen L, Guan B, Anderson DB, et al. Surgical interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2024;22(1). doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03653-z
  5. North American Spine Society. Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain. NASS. Published online 2021. doi:https://www.spine.org/Portals/0/assets/downloads/ResearchClinicalCare/Guidelines/LowBackPain.pdf
  6. Gonzalez G, Porto G, Hines K, et al. Clinical Outcomes with and without Adherence to Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Fusion Patients. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):1200. doi:10.3390/jcm12031200
  7. Kang YN, Ho YW, Chu W, Chou WS, Cheng SH. Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Global Spine J. 2022;12(3):493-502. doi:10.1177/2192568221997804
  8. North American Spine Society. Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: 2nd Edition. NASS. Published online 2014. doi:https://www.spine.org/Portals/0/Assets/Downloads/ResearchClinicalCare/Guidelines/Spondylolisthesis.pdf
  9. Meester RJ, Jacobs WCH, Spruit M, Kroeze RJ, van Hooff ML. Prognostic Factors for Outcome of Fusion Surgery in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain - A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2025;15(1):251-266. doi:10.1177/21925682241286031
  10. Said E, Abdel-Wanis ME, Ameen M, et al. Posterolateral Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Global Spine J. 2022;12(5):990-1002. doi:10.1177/21925682211016426
  11. Peters MJM, Bastiaenen CHG, Brans BT, Weijers RE, Willems PC. The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities to detect pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(10):1499-1510. doi:10.1007/s00256-019-03181-5
  12. How NE, Street JT, Dvorak MF, et al. Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(2):319-336. doi:10.1007/s10143-018-0951-3
  13. Boonsirikamchai W, Wilartratsami S, Ruangchainikom M, Korwutthikulrangsri E, Tongsai S, Luksanapruksa P. Pseudarthrosis risk factors in lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):433. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07531-w
  14. Maitra S, Mikhail C, Cho SK, Daubs MD. Preoperative Maximization to Reduce Complications in Spinal Surgery. Global Spine J. 2020;10(1_suppl):45S-52S. doi:10.1177/2192568219882349
  15. Daniels AH, Singh M, Knebel A, et al. Preoperative Optimization Strategies in Elective Spine Surgery. JBJS Rev. 2025;13(2). doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00210
  16. Arora A, Cummins DD, Wague A, et al. Preoperative medical assessment for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review. Spine Deform. 2023;11(4):773-785. doi:10.1007/s 43390-023-00654-5
  17. Peters MJM, Bastiaenen CHG, Brans BT, Weijers RE, Willems PC. The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities to detect pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(10):1499-1510. doi:10.1007/s00256-019-03181-5
  18. Boonsirikamchai W, Wilartratsami S, Ruangchainikom M, Korwutthikulrangsri E, Tongsai S, Luksanapruksa P. Pseudarthrosis risk factors in lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1). doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07531-w
  19. Rajaee SS, Kanim LEA, Bae HW. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(6):807-816. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.31149
  20. Rajesh N, Moudgil-Joshi J, Kaliaperumal C. Smoking and degenerative spinal disease: A systematic review. Brain and Spine. 2022;2. doi:10.1016/j.bas. 2022.100916
  21. Nunna RS, Ostrov PB, Ansari D, et al. The Risk of Nonunion in Smokers Revisited: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J. 2022;12(3):526-539. doi:10.1177/21925682211046899
  22. Feeley A, McDonnell J, Feeley I, Butler J. Obesity: An Independent Risk Factor for Complications in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2022;12(8):1894-1903. doi:10.1177/21925682211072849
  23. Cofano F, Perna G Di, Bongiovanni D, et al. Obesity and Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Review About Outcomes and Complications. Is It Time for New Perspectives on Future Researches? Global Spine J. 2022;12(6):1214-1230. doi:10.1177/21925682211022313

Coding Section

Code Number Description
CPT 22533 ARTHRODESIS, LATERAL EXTRACAVITARY TECHNIQUE, INCLUDING MINIMAL DISCECTOMY TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION); LUMBAR
  22558 ARTHRODESIS, ANTERIOR INTERBODY TECHNIQUE, INCLUDING MINIMAL DISCECTOMY TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION); LUMBAR
  22612 ARTHRODESIS, POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL TECHNIQUE, SINGLE LEVEL; LUMBAR (WITH LATERAL TRANSVERSE TECHNIQUE, WHEN PERFORMED)
  22630 ARTHRODESIS, POSTERIOR INTERBODY TECHNIQUE, INCLUDING LAMINECTOMY AND/OR DISCECTOMY TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION), SINGLE INTERSPACE; LUMBAR
  22633 ARTHRODESIS, COMBINED POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL TECHNIQUE WITH POSTERIOR INTERBODY TECHNIQUE INCLUDING LAMINECTOMY AND/OR DISCECTOMY SUFFICIENT TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION), SINGLE INTERSPACE AND SEGMENT; LUMBAR
  22534 ARTHRODESIS, LATERAL EXTRACAVITARY TECHNIQUE, INCLUDING MINIMAL DISCECTOMY TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION); THORACIC OR LUMBAR, EACH ADDITIONAL VERTEBRAL SEGMENT (LIST SEPARATELY IN ADDITION TO CODE FOR PRIMARY PROCEDURE)
  22585 ARTHRODESIS, ANTERIOR INTERBODY TECHNIQUE, INCLUDING MINIMAL DISCECTOMY TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION); EACH ADDITIONAL INTERSPACE (LIST SEPARATELY IN ADDITION TO CODE FOR PRIMARY PROCEDURE)
  22614 ARTHRODESIS, POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL TECHNIQUE, SINGLE LEVEL; EACH ADDITIONAL VERTEBRAL SEGMENT (LIST SEPARATELY IN ADDITION TO CODE FOR PRIMARY PROCEDURE) 
  22632 ARTHRODESIS, POSTERIOR INTERBODY TECHNIQUE, INCLUDING LAMINECTOMY AND/OR DISCECTOMY TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION), SINGLE INTERSPACE; EACH ADDITIONAL INTERSPACE (LIST SEPARATELY IN ADDITION TO CODE FOR PRIMARY PROCEDURE) 
  22634 ARTHRODESIS, COMBINED POSTERIOR OR POSTEROLATERAL TECHNIQUE WITH POSTERIOR INTERBODY TECHNIQUE INCLUDING LAMINECTOMY AND/OR DISCECTOMY SUFFICIENT TO PREPARE INTERSPACE (OTHER THAN FOR DECOMPRESSION), SINGLE INTERSPACE AND SEGMENT; EACH ADDITIONAL INTERSPACE AND SEGMENT (LIST SEPARATELY IN ADDITION TO CODE FOR PRIMARY PROCEDURE) 
  62380

Under Endoscopic Decompression of Neural Elements and/or Excision of Herniated Intervertebral Discs

  63030 Laminectomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy (unilateral or bilateral with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root[s], [e.g., spinal or lateral recess stenosis]), single vertebral segment; lumbar 
  63035

Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc; each additional interspace, cervical or lumbar (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 

  63005

Laminectomy with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy or discectomy (e.g., spinal stenosis), 1 or 2 vertebral segments; lumbar, except for spondylolisthesis 

  63012

Laminectomy with removal of abnormal facets and/or pars inter-articularis with decompression of cauda equina and nerve roots for spondylolisthesis, lumbar (Gill type procedure) 

  63017

Laminectomy with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or caudaequina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy or discectomy (e.g., spinal stenosis), more than 2 vertebral segments; lumbar 

  63042

Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, reexploration, single interspace; lumbar  

  63044

Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, reexploration, single interspace; each additional lumbar interspace (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)  

  63047

Laminectomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy (unilateral or bilateral with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root[s], [e.g., spinal or lateral recess stenosis]), single vertebral segment; lumbar  

  63048

Laminectomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy (unilateral or bilateral with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root[s], [e.g., spinal or lateral recess stenosis]), single vertebral segment; each additional segment, cervical, thoracic, or lumbar (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 

  63052  

Laminectomy, facetectomy, or foraminotomy with lumbar decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root during posterior interbody arthrodesis, single segment 

  63053  

Laminectomy, facetectomy, or foraminotomy with lumbar decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root, during posterior interbody arthrodesis, each additional segment 

  63056

Transpedicular approach with decompression of spinal cord, equina and/or nerve root(s) (e.g., herniated intervertebral disc), single segment; lumbar (including transfacet, or lateral extraforaminal approach) (e.g., far lateral herniated intervertebral disc) 

  63057

Transpedicular approach with decompression of spinal cord, equina and/or nerve root(s) (e.g., herniated intervertebral disc), single segment; each additional segment, thoracic or lumbar (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive. 

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community,  and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2017 Forward     

07/01/2026 Annual review, updating policy for clarity and consistency. Adding axial low back pain alone is a contraindication for multi-level lumbar fusion, elevated blood sugar as a relative contraindication for spine surgery, and adding negative nicotine lab test requirement for smokers prior to spine surgery approval. Also updating general information, adding special note, rationale, and references. 
09/24/2025

Overall formatting, updating duration for indicating lumbar spine fusion as revision surgery following a failed operation from 6-12 months to 9-12 months, references.

10/24/2024 Interim review to add clarification regarding cognitive behavior rehabilitation to read: Chronic low back pain or degenerative disc disease (disc degeneration without significant neurological compression presenting with low back pain) must have failed at least 6 months of appropriate active non-operative treatment (completion of a combined physical therapy and comprehensive cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation program is mandatory) and must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
10/21/2024 Annual review, no change to policy intent.
10/16/2023 Interim review, removing material related to SI joint as a new policy specific to SI joint fusion is being created.
04/01/2023 Annual review, no change to policy intent.
10/24/2022 Interim review updating coding and replacing the word patient with individual where appropriate. No change to the policy intent.

04/01/2022 

Annual review, no change to policy intent. 

11/29/2021 

Updating policy with 2022 coding. Adding code 63052 and 63053. No other change made. 

05/10/2021 

Correcting relative contraindication section. No change to policy intent. 

04/01/2021 

Corrected annual review date from 4/2021 to 4/2022. 

03/09/2021 

Annual review, adding policy verbiage for two level lumbar artificial disc replacement. Also updating rationale and references. 

01/21/2021 

Interim review to add clarification to the list of contraindications for lumbar disc replacement. No other changes. 

12/28/2020 

Reformatting for clarity. 

09/24/2020 

Updating coding. Adding code 63048 to coding section. No other changes. 

08/12/2020 

Updating coding. Adding codes 63030 and 63047. No change to intent to policy.

05/14/2020 

Interim review, updating conservative treatment language to include "in the last 6 months." Add lumbar Artificial Desc replacement and update policy. Also changing annual review to July. 

03/02/2020 

Annual review, no change to policy intent. 

9/30/2019 

Interim review to remove contraindication related to nicotine use to align with CAM 142. No other changes made. 

03/04/2019 

Annual review, no change to policy intent. 

03/19/2018 

Annual review, no change to policy intent. 

12/11/2017 

Updating policy with 2018 coding. No other changes made. 

03/22/2017

New Policy

Complementary Content
${loading}