CT Cervical Spine - CAM 705

General Information

It is an expectation that all patients receive care/services from a licensed clinician. All appropriate supporting documentation, including recent pertinent office visit notes, laboratory data, and results of any special testing must be provided. If applicable: All prior relevant imaging results and the reason that alternative imaging cannot be performed must be included in the documentation submitted.

Where a specific clinical indication is not directly addressed in this guideline, medical necessity determination will be made based on widely accepted standard of care criteria. These criteria are supported by evidence-based or peer-reviewed sources such as medical literature, societal guidelines and state/national recommendations.

Purpose
Computed tomography (CT) is performed for the evaluation of the cervical spine. CT may be used as the primary imaging modality, or it may complement other modalities. Primary indications for CT include conditions, e.g., traumatic, neoplastic, and infectious. CT is often used to study the cervical spine for conditions such as degenerative disc disease when MRI is contraindicated. CT provides excellent depiction of bone detail and is used in the evaluation of known fractures of the cervical spine and for evaluation of postoperative patients.
 

Policy

INDICATIONS FOR CERVICAL SPINE CT
Evaluation of Neurologic Deficits1,2
When Cervical Spine MRI Is Contraindicated or Inappropriate

  • With any of the following new neurological deficits documented on physical exam
    • Extremity muscular weakness (and not likely caused by plexopathy or peripheral neuropathy)
    • Pathologic (e.g., Babinski, Lhermitte's sign3, Chaddock Sign4, Hoffman’s and other upper motor neuron signs); OR abnormal deep tendon reflexes (and not likely caused by plexopathy, or peripheral neuropathy)
    • Absent/decreased sensory changes along a particular cervical dermatome (nerve distribution): pin prick, touch, vibration, proprioception, or temperature (and not likely caused by plexopathy or peripheral neuropathy)
    • Upper or lower extremity increase muscle tone/spasticity
    • New onset bowel or bladder dysfunction (e.g., retention or incontinence)—not related to an inherent bowel or bladder process
    • Gait abnormalities (see Table 1 below for more details)
  • Suspected cord compression with any neurological deficits as listed above

Evaluation of Neck Pain5,6
With Any of the Following When Cervical Spine MRI Is Contraindicated

  • With new or worsening objective neurologic deficits on exam, as above
  • Failure of conservative treatment* for a minimum of six weeks within the last six months;
  • NOTE - Failure of conservative treatment is defined as one of the following:
    • Lack of meaningful improvement after a full course of treatment; OR
    • Progression or worsening of symptoms during treatment; OR
    • Documentation of a medical reason the member is unable to participate in treatment
    • Closure of medical or therapy offices, patient inconvenience, or noncompliance without explanation does not constitute “inability to complete” treatment.
  • With progression or worsening of symptoms during the course of conservative treatment*
  • With an abnormal electromyography (EMG) or nerve conduction study (if performed) indicating a cervical radiculopathy. (EMG is not recommended to determine the cause of axial lumbar, thoracic, or cervical spine pain)7
  • Isolated neck pain in pediatric population8,9 (conservative care not required if red flags present). Red flags that prompt imaging include any ONE of the following:
    • Age 5 or younger
    • Constant pain
    • Pain lasting > 4 weeks
    • Abnormal neurologic examination
    • Early morning stiffness and/or gelling
    • Night pain that prevents or disrupts sleep
    • Radicular pain
    • Fever or weight loss or malaise,
    • Postural changes (e.g., kyphosis or scoliosis)
    • Limp (or refusal to walk in a younger child

Pre-Operative/Post-Operative/Procedural Evaluation
As part of initial pre-operative/post-operative/procedural evaluation (The best examinations are CT to assess for hardware complication, extent of fusion and pseudarthrosis and MRI for cord, nerve root compression, disc pathology, or post-op infection)(10)

Note: If ordered by Neurosurgeon or orthopedic surgeon for purposes of surgical planning, a contraindication to MRI is not required.

  • For preoperative evaluation/planning
  • CT discogram
  • Evaluation of post operative pseudoarthrosis after initial X-rays (CT should not be done before 6 months after surgery)
  • CSF leak highly suspected and supported by patient history and/or physical exam findings (leak [known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula -preferred exam CT myelogram])11
  • A follow-up study may be needed to help evaluate a patient’s progress after treatment, procedure, intervention, or surgery in the last 6 months. Documentation requires a medical reason that clearly indicates why additional imaging is needed for the type and area(s) requested (routine surveillance post-op not indicated without symptoms)
  • Surgical infection as evidenced by signs/symptoms, laboratory, or prior imaging findings
  • New or changing neurological deficits or symptoms post-operatively12 (see neurological deficit section above).
  • When combo requests (see +) are submitted (i.e., MRI and CT of the spine), the office notes should clearly document the need for both studies to be done simultaneously (e.g., the need for both soft tissue and bony anatomy is required)13
    • Combination requests where both cervical spine CT and MRI cervical spine are both approvable (not an all-inclusive list):
      • OPLL (Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament)14
      • Pathologic or complex fractures
      • Malignant process of spine with both bony and soft tissue involvement
      • Unstable craniocervical junction
      • Clearly documented indication for bony and soft tissue abnormality where assessment will change management for the patient

Evaluation of Suspected Myelopathy15,16
When Cervical Spine MRI Is Contraindicated

  • Does NOT require conservative care
  • Progressive symptoms including hand clumsiness, worsening handwriting, difficulty with grasping and holding objects, diffuse numbness in the hands, pins and needles sensation, increasing difficulty with balance and ambulation
  • Any of the neurological deficits as noted above

Evaluation of Trauma or Acute Injury17

  • Presents with any of the following neurological deficits as above
  • With progression or worsening of symptoms during the course of conservative treatment*
  • History of underlying spinal abnormalities (i.e., ankylosing spondylitis) (Both MRI and CT are approvable)18,19
  • When the patient is clinically unevaluable or there are preliminary imaging findings X-ray or CT) needing further evaluation
  • When office notes specify the patient meets NEXUS (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study) or CCR (Canadian Cervical Rules) criteria for imaging:17
    • CT for initial imaging
    • MRI when suspect spinal cord or nerve root injury or when patient is obtunded, and CT is negative
    • CT or MRI for treatment planning of unstable spine

MRI and CT provide complementary information. When indicated it is appropriate to perform both examinations
 

Evaluation of Known Fracture or New Compression Fractures17,20
(With Worsening Neck Pain)

  • To assess union of a fracture when physical examination, plain radiographs, or prior imaging suggest delayed or non-healing
  • To determine the position of fracture fragments
  • With history of malignancy (if MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed)
  • With an associated new focal neurologic deficit as above
  • Prior to a planned surgery/intervention or if the results of the CT will change management

CT Myelogram1,11
When MRI Cannot Be Performed/Contraindicated/Surgeon Preference

  • When signs and symptoms inconsistent or not explained by the MRI findings
  • Demonstration of the site of a CSF leak (known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula)
  • Surgical planning, especially regarding to the nerve roots or evaluation of dural sac
  • Evaluation of suspected brachial plexus or nerve root injury in the neonate


Evaluation of Tumor, Cancer, or Metastasis
With Any of the Following:

MRI is usually the preferred study (CT may be needed to further characterize solitary indeterminate lesions seen on MRI)6,21,22

  • Primary tumor
    • Initial staging primary spinal tumor23
    • Follow-up of known primary cancer of patient undergoing active treatment within the past year or as per surveillance imaging guidance for that cancer
    • Known spinal tumor with new signs or symptoms (e.g., new or increasing nontraumatic pain, physical, laboratory, and/or imaging findings)
    • With an associated new focal neurologic deficit as above17
  • Metastatic tumor
    • With evidence of metastasis on bone scan needing further clarification OR inconclusive findings on a prior imaging exam
    • With an associated new focal neurologic deficit17
    • Known malignancy with new signs or symptoms (e.g., new or increasing nontraumatic pain, radiculopathy or neck pain that occurs at night and wakes the patient from sleep with known active cancer, physical, laboratory, and/or imaging findings) in a tumor that tends to metastasize to the spine6,24

Further Evaluation of Indeterminate Findings
Unless follow-up is otherwise specified within the guideline

  • For initial evaluation of an inconclusive finding on a prior imaging report that requires further clarification. When MRI cannot be performed, is contraindicated, or CT is preferred to characterize the finding6
  • One follow-up exam of a prior indeterminate MR/CT finding to ensure no suspicious interval change has occurred. (No further surveillance unless specified as highly suspicious or change was found on last follow-up exam). When MRI cannot be performed, is contraindicated, or CT is preferred to characterize the finding.6

Evaluation of Known or Suspected Infection/Abscess25
When Cervical Spine MRI Is Contraindicated

  • As evidenced by signs and/or symptoms, laboratory (i.e., abnormal white blood cell count, ESR and/or CRP) or prior imaging findings
  • Follow-up imaging of infection
    • With worsening symptoms/laboratory values (i.e., white blood cell count, ESR/CRP) or radiographic findings

E.g., Osteomyelitis

Evaluation of Known or Suspected Inflammatory Disease or Atlantoaxial Instability26
When MRI Is Contraindicated or for Surgical Treatment Planning

  • In rheumatoid arthritis with neurologic signs/symptoms, or evidence of subluxation on radiographs (lateral radiograph in flexion and neutral should be the initial study)27,28
    • Patients with negative radiographs but symptoms suggestive of cervical instability or in patients with neurologic deficits
  • High-risk disorders affecting the atlantoaxial articulation, such as Down syndrome, Marfan syndrome with neurological signs/symptoms, abnormal neurological exam, or evidence of abnormal or inconclusive radiographs of the cervical spine29
  • Spondyloarthropathies, known or suspected
    • Ankylosing Spondylitis/Spondyloarthropathies with non-diagnostic or indeterminate x-ray and appropriate rheumatology workup


Evaluation of Spine Abnormalities Related to Immune System Suppression25
When Cervical Spine MRI Is Contraindicated

  • As evidenced by signs/symptoms, laboratory, or prior imaging findings

E.g., HIV, chemotherapy, leukemia, or lymphoma

Other Indications
When MRI Is Contraindicated or Cannot Be Performed

  • Tethered cord or spinal dysraphism (known or suspected), based on preliminary imaging, neurological exam, and/or high-risk cutaneous stigmata30,31,32
    • Known Arnold-Chiari syndrome (For initial imaging (one-time initial modality assessment) see combination below)
    • Known Chiari I malformation without syrinx or hydrocephalus, follow-up imaging after initial diagnosis with new or changing signs/symptoms or exam findings consistent with spinal cord pathology33
    • Known Chiari II (Arnold-Chiari syndrome), III, or IV malformation
    • Achondroplasia (one Cervical Spine MRI to assess the craniocervical junction, as early as possible (even in asymptomatic cases)34
  • Syrinx or syringomyelia (known or suspected)35
    • With neurologic findings and/or predisposing conditions (e.g., Chiari malformation, prior trauma, neoplasm, arachnoiditis, severe spondylosis)
    • To further characterize a suspicious abnormality seen on prior imaging
    • Known syrinx with new/worsening symptoms
  • Toe walking in a child with signs/symptoms of myelopathy localized to the Cervical Spine36
  • Suspected neuroinflammatory Conditions/Diseases (e.g., sarcoidosis, Behcet’s)
    • After detailed neurological exam and appropriate initial work up

Initial evaluation of trigeminal neuralgia not explained on recent brain imaging

Combination Studies
Brain CT/Cervical Spine CT/Thoracic Spine CT/Lumbar Spine CT (any Combination)

  • For initial evaluation of a suspected Arnold Chiari malformation
  • Follow-up imaging of a known type II or type III Arnold Chiari malformation. For Arnold Chiari type I, follow-up imaging only if new or changing signs/symptoms37,38,39,40,41
  • Oncological Applications (e.g., primary nervous system, metastatic)
    • Drop metastasis from brain or spine (CT spine imaging in this scenario is usually CT myelogram) see background
    • Suspected leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (see background)40
    • Tumor evaluation and monitoring in neurocutaneous syndromes
  • CSF leak highly suspected and supported by patient history and/or physical exam findings (known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula - CT spine imaging in this scenario is usually CT myelogram)

Cervical Spine and Thoracic Spine CT
●    Initial evaluation of known or suspected syrinx or syringomyelia

    • With neurologic findings and/or predisposing conditions (e.g., Chiari malformation, prior trauma, neoplasm, arachnoiditis, severe spondylosis)35
    • To further characterize a suspicious abnormality seen on prior imaging
    • Known syrinx with new/worsening symptom

Cervical Spine and/or Thoracic Spine and/or Lumbar Spine CTs (Any Combination)
Note: These body regions might be evaluated separately or in combination as documented in the clinical notes by physical examination findings (e.g., localization to a particular segment of the spinal cord), patient history, and other available information, including prior imaging.

Exception: Indications for combination studies42,43 are approved indications as noted below and being performed in children who will need anesthesia for the procedure

  • Any combination of these studies for:
    • Survey/complete initial assessment of infant/child with congenital scoliosis or juvenile idiopathic scoliosis under the age of 1044,45,46 (e.g., congenital scoliosis, idiopathic scoliosis, scoliosis with vertebral anomalies)
    • In the presence of neurological deficit, progressive spinal deformity, or for preoperative planning47
    • Back pain with known vertebral anomalies (hemivertebrae, hypoplasia, agenesis, butterfly, segmentation defect, bars, or congenital wedging) in a child on preliminary imaging
    • Scoliosis with any of the following:48
      • Progressive spinal deformity;
      • Neurologic deficit (new or unexplained);
      • Early onset;
      • Atypical curve (e.g., short segment, > 30 kyphosis, left thoracic curve, associated organ anomalies);
      • Pre-operative planning; OR
      • When office notes clearly document how imaging will change management
  • Arnold-Chiari malformations32,49
    • Arnold-Chiari I
      • For evaluation of spinal abnormalities associated with initial diagnosis of Arnold-Chiari Malformation. (C/T/L spine due to association with tethered cord and syringomyelia), and initial imaging has not been completed30,33
    • Arnold-Chiari II-IV - For initial evaluation and follow-up as appropriate
      • Usually associated with open and closed spinal dysraphism, particularly meningomyelocele30
  • Tethered cord, or spinal dysraphism (known or suspected) based on preliminary imaging, neurological exam, and/or high-risk cutaneous stigmata,30,31,32 when anesthesia required for imaging50 (e.g., meningomyelocele, lipomeningomyelocele, diastematomyelia, fatty/thickened filum terminale, and other spinal cord malformations)
  • Oncological Applications (e.g., primary nervous system, metastatic)
    • Drop metastasis from brain or spine (imaging also includes brain; CT spine imaging in this scenario is usually CT myelogram)
    • Suspected leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC)51
    • Any combination of these for spinal survey in patient with metastases
    • Tumor evaluation and monitoring in neurocutaneous syndromes
  • CSF leak highly suspected and supported by patient history and/or physical exam findings (leak [known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula -preferred exam CT myelogram])11
  • CT myelogram when meets above guidelines and MRI is contraindicated or for surgical planning
  • Post-procedure (discogram) CT

Combination Studies for Malignancy for Initial Staging or Restaging

  • Unless otherwise specified in this guideline, indication for combination studies for malignancy for initial staging or restaging:
    • Concurrent studies to include CT or MRI of any of the following areas as appropriate depending on the cancer: Abdomen, Brain, Chest, Neck, Pelvis, Cervical Spine, Thoracic Spine or Lumbar Spine

Other

  • When MRI is contraindicated OR cannot be performed OR Surgeon preference

BACKGROUND
Computed tomography (CT) is performed for the evaluation of the cervical spine. CT may be used as the primary imaging modality, or it may complement other modalities. Primary indications for CT include conditions, e.g., traumatic, neoplastic, and infectious. CT is often used to study the cervical spine for conditions such as degenerative disc disease when MRI is contraindicated. CT provides excellent depiction of bone detail and is used in the evaluation of known fractures of the cervical spine and for evaluation of postoperative patients.

Special Note
+If there is a combination request* for an overlapping body part, either requested at the same time or sequentially (within the past 3 months):

  • The results of the prior study should be inconclusive or show a need for inconclusive or show a need for additional or follow-up imaging evaluation OR
  • The office notes should clearly document an indication why overlapping imaging is needed and how it will change management for the patient.

(*Unless approvable in the combination section as noted in the guidelines)
 

OVERVIEW
*Conservative Treatment
Non-operative conservative treatment should include a multimodality approach consisting of at least one active and one inactive component targeting the affected region.

Active Modalities

  • Physical therapy
  • Physician-supervised home exercise program**
  • Chiropractic care

Inactive Modalities

  • Medications (e.g., NSAIDs, steroids, analgesics)
  • Injections (e.g., epidural injection, selective nerve root block)
  • Medical Devices (e.g., TENS unit, bracing)

**Home Exercise Program
The following two elements are required to meet conservative therapy guidelines for HEP:10

  • Documentation of an exercise prescription/plan provided by a physician, physical therapist, or chiropractor; AND
  • Follow-up documentation regarding completion of HEP after the required 6-week timeframe or inability to complete HEP due to a documented medical reason (e.g., increased pain or inability to physically perform exercises).

Cervical Myelopathy
Symptom severity varies, and a high index of suspicion is essential for making the proper diagnosis in early cases. Symptoms of pain and radiculopathy may not be present. The natural history of myelopathy is characterized by neurological deterioration. The most frequently encountered symptom is gait abnormality (86%) followed by increased muscular reflexes (79.1%), pathological reflexes (65.1%), paresthesia of upper limb (69.8%) and pain (67.4%).(15)

Gait and Spine Imaging
Table 152,53,54,55,56,57

Gait

Characteristic

Work up/Imaging

Hemiparetic

Spastic unilateral, circumduction

Brain and/or, Cervical spine imaging based on associated symptoms

Diplegic

Spastic bilateral, circumduction

Brain, Cervical and Thoracic Spine imaging

Myelopathic

Wide based, stiff, unsteady

Cervical and/or Thoracic spine MRI based on associated symptoms

Cerebellar Ataxic

Broad based, clumsy, staggering, lack of coordination, usually also with limb ataxia

Brain imaging see Brain MRI Guideline

Apraxic

Magnetic, shuffling, difficulty initiating

Brain imaging see Brain MRI Guideline

Parkinsonian

Stooped, small steps, rigid, turning en bloc, decreased arm swing

Brain Imaging see Brain MRI Guideline

Choreiform

Irregular, jerky, involuntary movements

Medication review, consider brain imaging as per movement disorder Brain MR guidelines

Sensory ataxic

Cautious, stomping, worsening without visual input (ie + Romberg)

EMG, blood work, consider spinal (cervical or thoracic cord imaging) imaging based on EMG

Neurogenic

Steppage, dragging of toes

  • EMG initial testing;
  • BUT if there is a foot drop, lumbar spine MRI is appropriate without EMG
  • Pelvis MR if there is evidence of plexopathy

Vestibular

Insecure, veer to one side, worse when eyes closed, vertigo

Consider Brain/IAC MRI see Brain MRI Guideline

CT Myelogram
Myelography is the instillation of intrathecal contrast media under fluoroscopy. Patients are then imaged with CT to evaluate for spinal canal pathology. Although this technique has diminished greatly due to the advent of MRI due to its non-invasiveness and superior soft- tissue contrast, myelography is still a useful technique for conventional indications, such as spinal stenosis, when MRI is contraindicated or nondiagnostic or surgeon preference (see guidelines above), brachial plexus injury in neonates, radiation therapy treatment planning, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.58

Contraindication and Preferred Studies

  • Contraindications and reasons why a CT/CTA cannot be performed may include: impaired renal function, significant allergy to IV contrast, pregnancy (depending on trimester)
  • Contraindications and reasons why an MRI/MRA cannot be performed may include: impaired renal function, claustrophobia, non-MRI compatible devices (such as non- compatible defibrillator or pacemaker), metallic fragments in a high-risk location, patient exceeds weight limit/dimensions of MRI machine

References

  1. Bono C, Ghiselli G, Gilbert T, et al. Evidence-based clinical guideline for Multidisciplinary Spine Care: Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy from Degenerative Disorders. North American Spine Society. 2010; 1-181.
  2. Magnus W, Viswanath O, Viswanathan V, et al. Cervical Radiculopathy. [Updated 2024 Jan 31]. StatPearls Publishing. 2024;
  3. Teoli D, Rocha Cabrero F, Smith T, Ghassemzadeh S. Lhermitte Sign [Updated 2023 Jul 21]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493237/.
  4. Acharya A B, Fowler J B. Chaddock Reflex [Updated 2023 Jun 26]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519555/.
  5. Costello J E, Shah L M, Peckham M E, Hutchins T A, Anzai Y. Imaging Appropriateness for Neck Pain. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: 584 - 589. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.11.005.
  6. McDonald M A, Kirsch C F, Amin B Y, Aulino J M, Bell A M et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cervical Neck Pain or Cervical Radiculopathy. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019; 16: S57 - S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.023.
  7. Sarwan G, De Jesus O. Electrodiagnostic Evaluation of Cervical Radiculopathy. [Updated 2023 Aug 23]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023;
  8. Booth T N, Iyer R S, Falcone R A J, Hayes L L, Jones J Y et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Back Pain—Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2017; 14: S13 - S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.039.
  9. Frosch M, Mauritz M, Bielack S, Blödt S, Dirksen U et al. Etiology, Risk Factors, and Diagnosis of Back Pain in Children and Adolescents: Evidence- and Consensus-Based Interdisciplinary Recommendations. Children (Basel, Switzerland). 2022; 9: 10.3390/children9020192.
  10. Hutchins T A, Peckham M, Shah L M, Parsons M S, Agarwal V et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Low Back Pain: 2021 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2021; 18: S361- S379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.002.
  11. Patel D M, Weinberg B D, Hoch M J. CT Myelography: Clinical Indications and Imaging Findings. RadioGraphics. 2020; 40: 470 - 484. 10.1148/rg.2020190135.
  12. Corona-Cedillo R, Saavedra-Navarrete M, Espinoza-Garcia J, Mendoza-Aguilar A, Ternovoy S. Imaging Assessment of the Postoperative Spine: An Updated Pictorial Review of Selected Complications. Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021: 9940001. 10.1155/2021/9940001.
  13. Mohamed M A, Majeske K D, Sachwani-Daswani G, Coffey D, Elghawy K M et al. Impact of MRI on changing management of the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients with a ‘negative’ CT scan. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open. 2016; 1: true. 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000016.
  14. Choi B, Song K, Chang H. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a review of literature. Asian Spine J. Dec 2011; 5: 267-76. 10.4184/asj.2011.5.4.267.
  15. Donnally III C, Hanna A, Odom C. Myelopathy [Updated 2023 Jan 15]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023; Accessed April 2024:
  16. Agarwal V, Shah L M, Parsons M S, Boulter D J, Cassidy R C et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2021 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2021; 18: S73 - S82. 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.01.020.
  17. Beckmann N M, West O C, Nunez D J, Kirsch C F, Aulino J M et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Trauma. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019; 16: S264 - S285. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.002.
  1. Czuczman G J, Mandell J C, Wessell D E, Lenchik L, Ahlawat S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Inflammatory Back Pain: Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: 2021 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2021; 18: S340 - S360. 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.003.
  2. Ren C, Zhu Q, Yuan H. Imaging features of spinal fractures in ankylosing spondylitis and the diagnostic value of different imaging methods. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery. 2021; 11: 2499-2508. 10.21037/qims-20-962.
  3. Khan M A, Jennings J W, Baker J C, Smolock A R, Shah L M et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures: 2022 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2023; 20: S102 - S124. 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.015.
  4. Bestic J M, Wessell D E, Beaman F D, Cassidy R C, Czuczman G J et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Primary Bone Tumors. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020; 17: S226 - S238. 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.038.
  5. Roberts C C, Daffner R H, Weissman B N, Bancroft L, Bennett D L et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Metastatic Bone Disease. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2010; 7: 400 - 409. 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015.
  6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Central Nervous System Cancers. NCCN. 2023;
  7. Ziu E, Viswanathan V K, Mesfin F B. Spinal Metastasis [Updated 2023 Aug 14]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023;
  8. Ortiz A O, Levitt A, Shah L M, Parsons M S, Agarwal V et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Infection. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2021; 18: S488 - S501. 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.001.
  9. Lacy J, Bajaj J, Gillis C. Atlantoaxial Instability. [Updated 2023 Jun 12]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023;
  10. Colebatch A N, Edwards C J, Østergaard M, van der Heijde D, Balint P V et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72: 804-14. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158.
  11. Mańczak M, Gasik R. Cervical spine instability in the course of rheumatoid arthritis - imaging methods. Reumatologia. 2017; 55: 201-207. 10.5114/reum.2017.69782.
  12. Henderson F C S, Austin C, Benzel E, Bolognese P, Ellenbogen R et al. Neurological and spinal manifestations of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017; 175C: 195-211. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31549.
  13. Iftikhar W, De Jesus O. Myelomeningocele. [Updated 2023 Aug 23]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023;
  14. Trapp B, de Andrade Lourenção Freddi T, de Oliveira Morais Hans M, Fonseca Teixeira Lemos Calixto I, Fujino E. A Practical Approach to Diagnosis of Spinal Dysraphism. RadioGraphics. 2021; 41: 559 - 575. 10.1148/rg.2021200103.
  15. Hidalgo J, Tork C, Varacallo M. Arnold-Chiari Malformation. [Updated 2023 Sep 4]. StatPearls Publishing.
  16. Kular S, Cascella M. Chiari I Malformation. [Updated 2022 Feb 5]. StatPearls Publishing. 2022;
  17. Legare J M. Achondroplasia [Updated 2023 May 11]. GeneReviews®. 2023;
  18. Shenoy V, Sampath R. Syringomyelia. [Updated 2023 Apr 10]. StatPearls Publishing. 2023;
  19. Zileli M, Borkar S, Sinha S, Reinas R, Alves O et al. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Natural Course and the Value of Diagnostic Techniques -WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. Neurospine. 2019; 16: 386-402. 10.14245/ns.1938240.120.
  1. Hidalgo J, Tork C, Varacallo M. Arnold-Chiari Malformation [Updated 2023 Sep 4]. StatPearls [Internet]. 2023; Accessed May 2024:
  2. Mohammad S A, Osman N M, Ahmed K A. The value of CSF flow studies in the management of CSF disorders in children: a pictorial review. Insights into imaging. 2019; 10: 3. 10.1186/s13244-019- 0686-x.
  3. Radic J, Cochrane D. Choosing Wisely Canada: Pediatric Neurosurgery Recommendations. Paediatr Child Health. Sep 2018; 23: 383-387. 10.1093/pch/pxy012.
  4. Wang N, Bertalan M S, Brastianos P K. Leptomeningeal metastasis from systemic cancer: Review and update on management.. Cancer. 2018; 124: 21-35. 10.1002/cncr.30911.
  5. Hatgaonkar A M, Mahajan S M, Hatgoankar K A, Bandre G R. MRI Insights in Chiari Malformation Type 1 and Variations With Hydrosyringomyelia. Cureus. 2024; 16: e55676.
  6. Utukuri P S, Shih R Y, Ajam A A, Callahan K E, Chen D et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache: 2022 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2023; 20: S70 - S93. 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.018.
  7. Hayes L L, Palasis S, Bartel T B, Booth T N, Iyer R S et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache–Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018; 15: S78 - S90. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.017.
  8. Strahle J, Smith B W, Martinez M, Bapuraj J R, Muraszko K M et al. The association between Chiari malformation Type I, spinal syrinx, and scoliosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015; 15: 607-11. 10.3171/2014.11.Peds14135.
  9. Mbamalu E, Hyacinthe J , Hui A, Tirabady T, Alvandi L. Early Onset Scoliosis and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Review of the Literature and Correlations With Pulmonary Dysfunction. Cureus. 2023; 15: e48900. 10.7759/cureus.48900.
  10. Jones J Y, Saigal G, Palasis S, Booth T N, Hayes L L et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Scoliosis-Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019; 16: S244 - S251. 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.018.
  11. Trenga A P, Singla A, Feger M A, Abel M F. Patterns of congenital bony spinal deformity and associated neural anomalies on X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging. J Child Orthop. 2016; 10: 343-52. 10.1007/s11832-016-0752-6.
  12. Ozturk C, Karadereler S, Ornek I, Enercan M, Ganiyusufoglu K. The role of routine magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop. 2010; 34: 543-6. 10.1007/s00264-009-0817-y.
  13. Toader C , Ples H, Covache-Busuioc R, Costin H, Bratu B et al. Decoding Chiari Malformation and Syringomyelia: From Epidemiology and Genetics to Advanced Diagnosis and Management Strategies. Brain sciences. 2023; 13: 10.3390/brainsci13121658.
  14. Kadom M, Reddy K, Cooper M, Knight-Scott J , Jones R. Diagnostic Excellence in Pediatric Spine Imaging: Using Contextualized Imaging. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2023; 13: 10.3390/diagnostics13182973.
  15. Sener U, Kumthekar P, Boire A. Advances in the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of leptomeningeal disease. Neuro-oncology advances. 2021; 3: v86-v95. 10.1093/noajnl/vdab108.
  16. Pirker W, Katzenschlager R. Gait disorders in adults and the elderly : A clinical guide. Wien Klin Wochenschr. Feb 2017; 129: 81-95. 10.1007/s00508-016-1096-4.
  17. Chhetri S, Gow D, Shaunak S, Varma A. Clinical assessment of the sensory ataxias; diagnostic algorithm with illustrative cases. Pract Neurol. Aug 2014; 14: 242-51. 10.1136/practneurol-2013- 000764.
  1. Foster H , Drummond P , Jandial S , Clinch J , Wood M. Evaluation of gait disorders in children. BMJ Best Practice. February 23, 2021; 2023:
  2. Haynes K, Wimberly R, VanPelt J, Jo C, Riccio A. Toe Walking: A Neurological Perspective After Referral From Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar 2018; 38: 152-156. 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001115.
  3. Marshall F. Approach to the elderly patient with gait disturbance. Neurol Clin Pract. Jun 2012; 2: 103-111. 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e31825a7823.
  4. Standford Medicine. Gait Abnormalities. 2023:
  5. American College of Radiology (ACR) , American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) , Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR). ACR-ASNR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Myelography and Cisternography. American Society of Neuroradiology. 2019 [Revised];

Coding Section

Codes Number Description
CPT 72125

Computed tomographic, cervical spine, without contrast material

  72126 

with contrast material

  72127 

 without contrast material, followed by contrast material(s) and further sections

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive. 

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2019 Forward 

11/01/2024 Annual review, no change to policy intent but policy reformatted for clarity and consistency including aligning combination studies across policies. Adding contraindication/preferred and purpose statement. Updating references.
11/09/2023 Annual review, updating entire policy. Adding general information statement. Adding statement abut indeterminate findings on prior imaging. Clarifying cerebellar ataxia in gait table. Adding statement about trigeminal neuralgia no explained in recent brain imaging.
11/11/2022 Annual review. Adding language regarding documentation need for combination requests for overlapping body parts that have already had scans withing the last three months. Also adding parenthetical statement related to contraindicated cervical spine mri and extremity muscular weakness.)
11/04/2021  Annual review, modifying language regarding neurological deficits, adding language regarding back pain in children, gait table, tumor imaging, toe walking, achondroplasia and MS criteria. Also updating description and references. 
11/12/2020  Annual review, expanded and revised policy verbiage for multiple different issues. Also updating description and references. 
11/22/2019                 NEW POLICY  
Complementary Content
${loading}