Streptococcus are Gram-positive, catalase-negative bacteria that are further divided into α-hemolytic, such as S. pneumoniae and S. mutans; β-hemolytic, such as S. pyogenes (Group A), S. agalactiae (Group B), and S. dysgalactiae subsp equisimilis (Groups C and G); and γ-hemolytic, such as Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium (Wessels, 2024). Streptococcal infections can be manifested in a variety of pathologies, including cutaneous infections, pharyngitis, acute rheumatic fever, pneumonia, postpartum endometritis, and toxic shock syndrome to name a few. Streptococcal infections can be identified using bacterial cultures obtained from blood, saliva, pus, mucosal, and skin samples as well as rapid antigen diagnostic testing (RADT) and nucleic acid-based methodologies (Chow, 2023; Wessels, 2024).

For prenatal screening of Group B Streptococcus, please review policy.

Regulatory Status 
The FDA approved the Lyra Direct Strep Assay (k133833) on 04/16/2014 and reclassified it on 07/11/2014. It is a “Real-Time PCR in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection and differentiation of Group A β -hemolytic Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) and pyogenic Group C and G β -hemolytic Streptococcus nucleic acids isolated from throat swab specimens obtained from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis, such as sore throat. The assay does not differentiate between pyogenic Groups C and G β-hemolytic Streptococcus” (Hojvat, 2014). The FDA has also approved the Solana Strep Complete Assay by Quidel that is “an in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of Group A, C and G beta- hemolytic Streptococcus in throat swab specimens from symptomatic patients” on 10/25/2016 (K162274) (FDA, 2016).

On 03/06/2019, the FDA approved GenePOC’s Strep A assay to be performed using GenePOC’s Revogene instrument as a “single-use test for qualitative detection of Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus-GAS) nucleic acids from throat swab specimens obtained from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis” (FDA, 2019).

On November 9, 2020, the FDA approved Mesa Biotech, Inc.’s Accula™ Strep A Test, which is a semi-automated, colorimetric polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nucleic acid amplification test “to qualitatively detect Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A βhemolytic Streptococcus, Strep A) bacterial nucleic acid from unprocessed throat swabs that have not undergone prior nucleic acid extraction” (FDA, 2020).

Policy 

1. For the detection of a streptococcal infection causing respiratory illness, bacterial culture testing from a throat swab is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY when one of the following conditions is met:
   1. When the individual has a modified Centor criteria score of 3 or greater (see Note 1 below).
   2. When the individual is suspected of having bacterial pharyngitis in the absence of viral features, (e.g., cough, oral ulcers, rhinorrhea).
   3. Following a negative rapid antigen diagnostic test (RADT) in a symptomatic child or adolescent.
2. Blood culture testing for a streptococcal infection is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY when one of the following conditions is met:
   1. For individuals who fail to demonstrate clinical improvement.
   2. For individuals who have progressive symptoms or clinical deterioration after the initiation of antibiotic therapy.
   3. In cases of suspected prosthetic joint infection.
3. In cases of skin and/or soft tissue infections, bacterial culture testing for a streptococcal infection from a skin swab or from pus is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY.
4. For individuals with suspected acute rheumatic fever (ARF) or post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN), the following testing is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY:
   1. Serological titer testing.
   2. Anti-streptolysin O immunoassay.
   3. Hyaluronidase activity or anti-hyaluronidase immunoassay.
   4. Streptokinase activity or anti-streptokinase immunoassay.
5. In cases of suspected viral pharyngitis, bacterial culture testing for streptococci from a throat swab is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY.
6. Except in cases of asymptomatic children under the age of three years who have a mitigating circumstance (including a symptomatic family member), RADT for a streptococcal infection is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY in any of the following situations:
   1. As a follow-up test for individuals who have had either a bacterial culture test or a nucleic acid test for a streptococcal infection.
   2. As a screening method in an asymptomatic patient.
   3. For individuals with suspected viral pharyngitis.
7. For all situations not described above, serological titer testing is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY.
8. Simultaneous ordering of both direct probe and amplification probe for the same organism in a single encounter is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY.

The following does not meet coverage criteria due to a lack of available published scientific literature confirming that the test(s) is/are required and beneficial for the diagnosis and treatment of an individual’s illness.

9. For all situations not described above, testing with an anti-streptolysin O immunoassay, a hyaluronidase activity or anti-hyaluronidase immunoassay, or a streptokinase activity or anti-streptokinase immunoassay is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY.
10. For all situations, the following tests is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY:
    1. Panel tests that screen and identify multiple streptococcal strains (S. pyogenes [group A], S. agalactiae [group B], S. dysgalactiae [groups C/G], -hemolytic streptococcus, and/or -hemolytic streptococcus), using either immunoassay or nucleic acid-based assays (e.g., Solana Strep Complete Assay, Lyra Direct Strep Assay).
    2. MALDI-TOF identification of streptococcus.
    3. The quantification of any strain of streptococcus using nucleic acid amplification, including PCR.
    4. Nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotidase activity or anti-nicotinamide-adenine immunoassay.

NOTES:
Note 1: Centor criteria includes tonsillar exudates, tender anterior cervical lymphadenopathy, fever, and absence of cough with each criterion being worth one point (Chow, 2023).

Table of Terminology

Rationale
Bacterial acute pharyngitis is caused most often by a Group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes or GAS), accounting for 5-15% of all acute pharyngitis cases in adults. Group C or Group G Streptococcus (S. dysgalactiae subsp equisimilis or GCS/GGS) is believed to be a causative agent in 5-10% of the cases of pharyngitis; however, “pharyngitis cause group C or G Streptococcus is clinically indistinguishable from GAS pharyngitis” but is more common in young adults and college students (Chow, 2023). “Diagnosis of infection due to group C streptococci (GCS) and group G streptococci (GGS) depends on identification of the organism in a culture from a clinical specimen. In general, a positive culture from a normally sterile site, such as blood, synovial fluid, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), can be considered definitive evidence of infection in the setting of a compatible clinical syndrome. The interpretation of positive cultures for GCS or GGS from the pharynx or from cutaneous sites such as open ulcers or wounds is less straightforward since asymptomatic colonization of the upper airway and skin also occurs” (Wessels, 2024). GAS occurs most frequently in the very young and the elderly; although, GAS infections can occur in any age-group. The rates of severe GAS infections have been increasing in the United States as well as in other developed nations (Schwartz et al., 1990).

The Centor criteria can be used to gauge the likelihood of pharyngitis due to a GAS infection. The four components of the Centor criteria are tonsillar exudates, tender anterior cervical lymphadenopathy, fever, and absence of cough with each criterion being worth one point. Patients who score less than three according to the Centor criteria are unlikely to have pharyngitis due to GAS and do not require strep testing or antibiotics; patients scoring ≥ three can be tested for GAS pharyngitis (Chow, 2023).

Group A Streptococcus is associated with bacterial pharyngitis, scarlet fever, acute rheumatic fever, and post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. Group A strep pharyngitis presents as a sudden onset of sore throat with odynophagia and fever; it is commonly referred to as “strep throat.” In children, additional symptoms can include abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Viral pharyngitis, which accounts for more than 80% of pharyngitis, typically presents with cough, rhinorrhea, hoarseness, oral ulcers, and conjunctivitis unlike GAS pharyngitis. Rare cases of mucopurulent rhinitis caused by GAS has been reported in children under the age of three (CDC, 2024a). Scarlet fever can accompany strep throat. Besides the typical erythematous rash that typically begins on the trunk before spreading outward, scarlet fever can also present as a flushed face, “and the area around the mouth may appear pale (i.e., circumoral pallor).” “Strawberry tongue” can occur due to “yellowish white coating with red papillae” (CDC, 2024b). Scarlet fever is more easily transmitted than asymptomatic carriers through saliva and nasal secretions. Acute Rheumatic Fever (AFR), besides the characteristic fever, can affect the cardiovascular system (carditis and valvulitis), the musculoskeletal system (arthritis), the integumentary system (subcutaneous nodules and erythema marginatum), and the central nervous system (chorea). “Inadequate or lack of antibiotic treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis increases the risk of someone developing acute rheumatic fever. In approximately one-third of patients, acute rheumatic fever follows subclinical streptococcal infections or infections for which medical attention was not sought” (CDC, 2024d). Post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN) presents with edema, hypertension, proteinuria, macroscopic hematuria, lethargy, and, at times, anorexia. “Laboratory examination usually reveals mild normocytic normochromic anemia, slight hypoproteinemia, elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and low total hemolytic complement and C3 complement.” Urine output is usually decreased, and urine examination “often reveals protein (usually <3 grams per day) and hemoglobin with red blood cell casts” (CDC, 2024c).

The virulence factors of GAS include M proteins, a group of more than 80 known proteins that protein the bacteria against phagocytosis; streptolysin O, a thiol-activated cytolysin; hyaluronidase, which hydrolyzes hyaluronic acid within the host tissue; streptokinase, an enzyme that activates plasmin; nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotidase (NADase), a glycohydrolase of uncertain function; and deoxyribonucleases (DNases) A, B, C, and D. Streptolysin O bind to the eukaryotic membrane’s cholesterol to facilitate the characteristic cellular lysis of a GAS infection. Cholesterol and anti-streptolysis O (ASO) antibodies can mitigate streptolysin O damage, and ASO titers often increase following an infection with the peak occurring around four to five weeks post-infection. “Nonsuppurative complications such as rheumatic fever and poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis generally develop during the second or third week of illness. … About 80 percent of patients with acute rheumatic fever or poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis demonstrate a rise in ASO titer; however, the degree of ASO titer elevation does not correlate with severity of disease. In patients with suspected rheumatic fever or glomerulonephritis but with an undetectable ASO titer, prompt testing for other antistreptococcal antibodies such as anti-DNase B (detectable for six to nine months following infection), streptokinase, and antihyaluronidase should be performed” (Stevens & Bryant, 2024).

Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) can occur two to four weeks following GAS pharyngitis. The five major manifestations of ARF are carditis and valvulitis (up to 70% of patients exhibit this condition with ARF), arthritis (up to 66%), CNS system involvement (10% – 30%), subcutaneous nodules (0-10%), and erythema marginatum (< 6%) (Steer & Gibofsky, 2024). A diagnosis of ARF is not predicated by confirmation of a preceding GAS infection; however, it is helpful, especially in diagnosing children and young adults with arthritis and/or carditis. Evidence of GAS should include either a positive throat culture, a positive RADT, or an elevated or rising titer of either ASO or anti-DNase B. These two antibodies are used frequently in clinical practice due to their high sensitivity in diagnosing streptococcal infections (Steer & Gibofsky, 2024; Steer et al., 2015). A study by Blyth and Robertson demonstrated that the sensitivity of using only a single antibody in the diagnosis of streptococcus ranged from 70.5-72.7%; however, the combination of ASO and anti-DNase B increased the specificity to 88.6% with a sensitivity of 95.5%. The addition of anti-streptokinase (ASK) did not increase either the sensitivity or specificity of testing (Blyth & Robertson, 2006).

A study in Norway in 2013 show that necrotizing soft tissue infections can be caused by GAS or GGS/GCS. The mean annual incidence rate is 1.4 per 100,000. During the time period studied (2000-2009), 61 cases of necrotizing soft tissue infections in Norway were due to GAS while nine cases were due to GCS/GGS. “Our findings indicate a high frequency of streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis in our community. GCS/GGS infections contribute to the disease burden but differ from GAS cases in frequency and predisposing factors.” They note that “the GCS/GGS patients were older, had comorbidities more often and had anatomically more superficial disease than the GAS patients” (Bruun et al., 2013). A review in 2014 also noted the population most affected by GCS/GGS, but they note that “the case fatality in bacteremia has been reported to be 15-18%” (Rantala, 2014).

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is frequently found in human gastrointestinal tracts and genitalia and can be spread to the upper respiratory tract of newborns. In neonates, a GBS infections can cause bacteremia, pneumonia, meningitis, and sepsis. GBS can also cause complications in pregnancy, such as urinary tract infections and chorioamnionitis. GBS, in pregnant and postpartum individuals, is of special concern since it is implicated in up to 31% of cases of bacteremia without a focus, eight percent of postpartum endometritis, and two percent of pneumonia; moreover, if left unchecked, GBS can also result in preterm labor and miscarriage. In the adult population at large, GBS infections can be manifest as soft tissue infections, sepsis, and bacteremia (Barshak, 2024; Puopolo et al., 2024). “Invasive disease in infants is categorized on the basis of chronologic age at onset. Early-onset disease usually occurs within the first 24 hours of life (range, 0 through 6 days) and is characterized by signs of systemic infection, respiratory distress, apnea, shock, pneumonia, and less often, meningitis (5% – 10% of cases). Late-onset disease, which typically occurs at 3 to 4 weeks of age (range, 7 through 89 days), commonly manifests as occult bacteremia or meningitis (approximately 30% of cases); other focal infections, such as osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, necrotizing fasciitis, pneumonia, adenitis, and cellulitis, occur less commonly. Nearly 50% of survivors of early- or late-onset meningitis have long-term neurologic sequelae (encephalomalacia, cortical blindness, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, hearing deficits, or learning disabilities). Late, late-onset disease occurs at 90 days of age and beyond, usually in very preterm infants requiring prolonged hospitalization” (Pediatrics, 2018).

Type of Testing

Clinical Utility and Validity
Rapid in vitro diagnostic tests (RIDT), such as the Alere I Strep A, have been CLIA-waived by the FDA. These tests provide results more quickly than the traditional “gold standard” bacterial culture testing. A 2018 study comparing rapid antigen GAS testing, the Alere I Strep A test — an RIDT using isothermal nucleic acid amplification, and throat cultures. “The sensitivity and specificity of the molecular test were 98% and 100%, respectively, compared with culture. There was a 9% false-positive rate with the rapid antigen-based testing. … The Alere test is sufficiently sensitive and specific for definitive GAS testing in a pediatric urgent care setting” (Weinzierl et al., 2018). In Cohen et al. (2016) extensively reviewed the use of rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for GAS in children. They reviewed 98 unique studies consisting of a total of 101,121 participants and compared both major types of RADTs — enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and optical immunoassays (OIA). “RADT had a summary sensitivity of 85.6%. ... There was substantial heterogeneity in sensitivity across studies; specificity was more stable. There was no trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. … The sensitivity of EIA and OIA tests was comparable (summary sensitivity 85.4% versus 86.2%). … Based on these results, we would expect that amongst 100 children with strep throat, 86 would be correctly detected with the rapid test while 14 would be missed and not receive antibiotic treatment” (Cohen et al., 2016). Another multicenter study using the Alere I Strep A test on cultures obtained from 481 patients of all ages show that the RIDT had 96.0% sensitivity and 94.6% specificity. The authors conclude that this “could provide a one-step, rapid, point-of-care testing method for GAS pharyngitis and obviate backup testing on negative results” (Cohen et al., 2015). This study did note that there are newer tests available that have higher sensitivity, but these tests require more time than the Alere I Strep A method. 

Due to the time constraints of clinical laboratories and the variability of RADTs, nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) use has been increasing in clinical settings. The FDA has approved multiple NAATs for the detection of Streptococcus. The Lyra Direct strep assay is an FDA-approved, NAAT that uses real-time PCR to qualitatively detect the presence of GAS and GGS/GCS in throat swab samples. It should be noted, though, that this assay does not distinguish between GGS and GCS. A study by Boyanton et al. (2016) evaluated the efficacy of the Lyra Direct method as compared to the traditional, time-consuming culture test for GAS and GGS/GCS. The sample sizes were not large (n = 19 for GAS and n = 5 for GGS/GCS out of a total of 161 samples submitted); however, the Lyra Direct strep assay did correctly detect “all b-hemolytic streptococci ...” and “in batch mode, the Lyra assay reduced intra-laboratory turnaround time by 60% (18.1 h versus 45.0 h) but increased hands-on time by 96% (3 min 16 s versus 1 min 40 s per specimen)” (Boyanton et al., 2016). The authors note that the RADTs “have largely augmented bacterial culture (the gold standard). However, the performance of commercially available [RADTs] varies greatly depending upon the manufacturer, methodology used (i.e., optical immunoassay, immunochromatographic, or enzyme immunoassay), and the patient population (i.e., pediatric versus adult) being tested. Due to these limitations, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are being implemented in clinical laboratories” (Boyanton et al., 2016). The Solana method is also an FDA-approved NAAT, but it uses a rapid helicase-dependent amplification (HDA) methodology. Solana is available for either GAS testing or as a panel testing for GAS, GCS, and GGS. A study by Uphoff et al. (2016) compared the Solana GAS testing to that of conventional culture testing. Their research used 1082 throat swab specimens. The traditional culture tested positive in 20.7% of the samples as compared to 22.6% positive values in the HDA-based methodology. The Solana assay in their results had 98.2% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity. “In 35 min, the HDA method provided rapid, sensitive GAS detection, making culture confirmation unnecessary” (Uphoff et al., 2016). Recently, another study compared an HDA-based method to the Simplex GAS Direct PCR-based method, which is another FDA-approved diagnostic test. The Simplex GAS Direct method does not require initial DNA extraction from the sample, a potential time-saving benefit. The study used 289 throat swabs. The HDA- based method “compared to Simplexa qPCR had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93.1% vs 100%, 100% vs. 100%, 100% vs. 100% and 98.31% vs. 100% respectively… Simplexa qPCR has improved performance and diagnostic efficiency in a high-volume laboratory compared to [HDA-based method] for GAS detection in throat swabs” (Church et al., 2018).

The Solana® Strep Complete Assay by Quidel received FDA clearance in 2016. According to Quidel’s FDA application, it is defined as “a rapid in vitro diagnostic test, using isothermal amplification technology (helicase-dependent amplification, HDA) for the qualitative detection and differentiation of Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus) and Streptococcus dysgalactiae (pyogenic Group C and G β-hemolytic Streptococcus) nucleic acids isolated from throat swab specimens obtained from patients with signs and symptoms of pharyngitis, such as sore throat” (Lollar, 2016). This test must be performed using Quidel’s Solana proprietary equipment. According to the 510(k) application, the Solana Strep Complete Assay panel has a clinical sensitivity and specificity for GAS of 98.8% and 98.9%, respectively, as compared to the Lyra Direct Strep Assay’s reported 96.5% sensitivity and 98.0% specificity for GAS. The Lyra Direct Strep Assay is a real-time PCR-based assay that cannot differentiate between the pyogenic strains of streptococci. Concerning the pyrogenic GCS/GGS, the Solana Strep Complete Assay panel has a clinical sensitivity of 100% with a specificity of 99.5% as compared to Lyra Direct Strep Assay’s reported 95.7% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity for GCS/GGS strains. The reported testing time also varies between the two assays with Solana requiring 25 minutes versus 60 – 70 minutes for the Lyra Direct Strep Assay (Lollar, 2016).

A recent study by Helmig and Gertsen (2017) evaluated the accuracy of PCR-based testing for GBS in pregnant individuals. Their study used rectovaginal swabs from 106 women in gestational weeks 35 – 37. For each, both a GBC culture and a PCR-based molecular GBS test (Xpert GBS of Cepheid Ltd) were performed. Only one PCR test yielded no result, so the invalid PCR-based test rate is < 1%. There were 25/106 of the GBS cultures tested positive as compared to 27/105 of the PCR-based test. The specificity of the PCR-based test was 97.5% with a 100% sensitivity and a 92.6% positive predictive value. The authors conclude that “the PCR test has sufficient accuracy to direct intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for GBS transmission during delivery” (Helmig & Gertsen, 2017). A preliminary study in France of 1,416 mothers with newborns compared swab cultures and GBS PCR assay for their predictive value of early-onset bacterial sepsis (EOS) in newborns since GBS is the most common cause of EOS. The results show that “the diagnostic values of the two tests highlighted a nonsignificant superiority of intrapartum GBS PCR assay” but that “the negative predictive value was improved with intrapartum PCR assay (negative likelihood ratio [LR]: 0.3 [0.1 – 0.9] vs. 0.6 [0.4 – 1.1]). … These results suggest that the intrapartum GBS PCR assay offers a better predictive value of GBS EOS that the usual vaginal culture swab at the 9th month but requires confirmation by large studies” (Raignoux et al., 2016).

Luo et al. (2019) “evaluated the overall diagnosis and treatment of acute pharyngitis in the United States, including predictors of test type and antibiotic prescription.” Five categories of tests were identified, which were RADT [rapid antigen detection test], RADT plus culture, other tests, nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), and no test. Pharyngitis events from 2011 – 2015 were examined and a total of 18.8 million pharyngitis events across 11.6 million patients were included. Overall, 68.2% of events were found to occur once, with 29.1% requiring further follow-up. Furthermore, 43% of events were diagnosed by RADT and 20% were diagnosed by RADT plus culture. NAAT testing also increased 3.5-fold from 2011-2015 (going from 0.06% to 0.27%). Antibiotics were used in 49.3% of events as a whole. For RADT plus culture, antibiotics were used 31.2% of the time, for NAAT alone, 34.5%, for RADT alone, 54.2%, for no test, 57.1%. The authors concluded that “Diagnostic testing can help lower the incidence of inappropriate antibiotic use, and inclusion of NAAT in the clinical guidelines for GAS pharyngitis warrants consideration” (Luo et al., 2019).

O. Luiz et al. (2019) evaluated the “prevalence and persistence of beta-haemolytic streptococci throat carriage and type the bacterial population.” A total of 121 children and 127 young adult volunteers contributed throat swabs (for culture), and these volunteers were screened quarterly for beta-haemolytic bacterial species. Carriage was detected in 34 volunteers (13.7%). Seventeen children were found to carry Group A Streptococcus, while seventeen young adults were found to carry four separate subspecies (Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (SDSE), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae and the Streptococcus anginosus group). The authors also identified persistent carriage for as long as six months in two children and for as long as one year in three young adults. The authors concluded that “prevalence was slightly greater among children, but persistent carriage was greater among young adults, with SDSE being the species most associated with persistence” (O. Luiz et al., 2019).

Fraser et al. (2020) performed a meta-analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of point-of-care testing for detection of Group A Streptococcus. The authors remarked that this type of testing has seen increased use as an adjunct for managing care, such as for prescribing antibiotics. Thirty-eight studies of clinical effectiveness were included, along with three studies of cost-effectiveness. Twenty-six articles “reported on the test accuracy of point-of-care tests and/or clinical scores with biological culture as a reference standard.” Overall, 21 point-of-care tests were evaluated. The authors identified two populations of interest; “patients with Centor/McIsaac scores of ≥ 3 points or FeverPAIN scores of ≥ 4 points.” Test sensitivity for these populations ranged from 0.829-0.946 while test specificity ranged from 0.849 – 0.991. However, the authors did note there was significant heterogeneity and expressed doubts that any single study “accurately captured a test's true performance.” The authors developed an economic model to explore the cost-effectiveness of this type of testing, and 14 of the 21 tests were included in this model. Per the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's cost-effectiveness thresholds, these tests were not found to be cost-effective. The authors acknowledged significant uncertainties in the estimates, such as penalties for antibiotic over-prescriptions. The authors concluded that “the systematic review and the cost-effectiveness models identified uncertainties around the adoption of point-of-care tests in primary and secondary care settings. Although sensitivity and specificity estimates are promising, we have little information to establish the most accurate point-of-care test” (Fraser et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2019).

Bilir et al. (2021) studied the cost-effectiveness of point of care (POC) nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for streptococcus in the U.S.. Point of care NAAT was compared to rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) and culture. Costs, clinical effects, antibiotic complications, number of patients treated, and antibiotic utilization were studied. Analysis showed that the POC NAAT method would cost $44 per patient while RADT and culture would cost $78 per patient. "Compared with RADT + culture, POC NAAT would increase the number of appropriately treated patients and avert unnecessary use of antibiotics.” According to the results, “POC NAAT would be less costly and more effective than RADT + culture; POC NAAT adoption may yield cost savings to U.S. third-party payers. Access to POC NAAT is important to optimize GAS diagnosis and treatment decisions in the United States" (Bilir et al., 2021). 

In a metanalysis, Dubois et al. (2021) studied the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen detection tests (NADTs) vs. rapid nucleic acid tests (RNATs) for diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. A total of 38 studies using RNAT were included, with a sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 95.1%. RADTs had a sensitivity of 82.3%, but specificity was similar to the sensitivity of RNATs. Overall, RNATs were more sensitive than RADTs. The authors conclude that "the high diagnostic accuracy of RNATs may allow their use as stand-alone tests to diagnose group A streptococcus pharyngitis" (Dubois et al., 2021). 

McCarty et al. (2022) studied the clinical utility on the GenMark Dx ePlex^® blood culture identification gram-positive panel. The panel results were evaluated and compared to MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing. One hundred Gram-Positive bacteria were represented. “The positive percent agreement (PPA) was 97/97 with 2 false positives.” The study included chart reviews of 80 patients. The average time for organism identification was 24.4 hours faster, and the average time for optimization was 29.2 hours faster for the eight patients identified with organisms such as streptococci. The authors “confirm high sensitivity and specificity of the FDA-cleared GenMark Dx ePlex BCID-GP Panel compared to MALDI-TOF MS on bacterial isolates and identify opportunities for earlier optimization of antimicrobial therapy that may also be accompanied by potential cost savings (McCarty et al., 2022).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
Acute Pharyngitis (CDC, 2024a): Most cases of acute pharyngitis are viral. Only 20% – 30% of pharyngitis episodes in children and 5% – 15% in adults are due to group A Streptococcus (GAS). History and clinical examination can be used to diagnosis viral pharyngitis when clear viral symptoms (e.g., cough, rhinorrhea, hoarseness, oral ulcers, conjunctivitis) are present; these patients do not need testing for group A strep. However, clinical examination cannot be used to differentiate viral and group A strep pharyngitis in the absence of viral symptoms, even for experienced clinicians. The diagnosis of group A strep pharyngitis is confirmed by either a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) or a throat culture. RADTs have high specificity for group A strep but varying sensitivities when compared to throat culture, which is considered the gold standard diagnostic test. Health care providers can use a positive RADT or throat culture as confirmation of group A strep pharyngitis. For children older than three years old healthcare providers should follow up a negative RADT with a throat culture. For all other ages a throat culture after a negative RADT is not routinely indicated (CDC, 2024a).