Description
Degenerative cervical spine disorders, while often benign and episodic in nature, can become debilitating, resulting in axial pain and neurological damage to the spinal cord. Compression on the nerve root and / or spinal cord may be caused by (1) a herniated disc with or without extrusion of disc fragments and/or (2) degenerative cervical spondylosis.

Spine surgery is a complex area of medicine. Operative treatment is indicated only when the natural history of an operatively treatable problem is better than the natural history of the problem without operative treatment. Choice of surgical approach is based on anatomy, the candidate’s pathology, and the surgeon's experience and preference. All operative interventions must be based on a positive correlation with clinical findings, the natural history of the disease, the clinical course, and diagnostic tests or imaging results.

Anterior surgical approaches
Anterior surgical approaches to cervical spine decompression emerged in the 1950s in response to technical limitations experienced with posterior approaches, including restricted access to and exposure of midline bony spurs and disc fragments. Anterior approaches include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Discectomy is removal of all or part of a herniated or ruptured disc or spondolytic bony spur to alleviate pressure on the nerve roots or on the spinal cord in individuals with symptomatic radiculopathy. Discectomy is most often combined with fusion to stabilize the spine.

Posterior surgical approaches
Posterior surgical approaches include laminectomy, laminoplasty, and laminoforaminotomy (also known as posterior discectomy). Laminectomy is the removal of the bone between the spinal process and facet pedicle junction to expose the neural elements of the spine. This allows for the inspection of the spinal canal, identification and removal of pathological tissue, and decompression of the cord and roots. Laminoplasty is the opening of the lamina to enlarge the spinal canal. There are several laminoplasty techniques; all aim to alleviate cord compression by reconstructing the spinal canal. Laminoplasty is commonly performed to decompress the spinal cord in those with degenerative spinal stenosis.

Laminoforaminotomy (also known as posterior discectomy) is the creation of a small window in the lamina to facilitate removal of arthritic bone spurs and herniated disc material pressing on the nerve root as it exits through the foramen. The opening of the foramen is widened so that the nerve exits without being compressed.

Policy 

Anterior Cervical Decompression With Fusion (ACDF) — Single Level

The following criteria must be met*:

• Positive clinical findings of myelopathy with evidence of progressive neurologic deficits consistent with spinal cord compression - immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (AA0S, 2013; Bono, 2011; Cunningham, 2010; Holly, 2009; Matz, 2009a; Matz, 2009b; Matz, 2009d; Matz, 2009e; Mummaneni, 2009; Tetreault, 2013; Yalamanchili, 2012; Zhu, 2013). Symptoms may include:
  • Upper extremity weakness.
  • Unsteady gait related to myelopathy/balance or generalized lower extremity weakness.
  • Disturbance with coordination.
  • Hyperreflexia.
  • Hoffmann sign.
  • Positive Babinski sign and/or clonus. 
• Progressive neurological deficit (motor deficit, bowel or bladder dysfunction) with evidence of spinal cord or nerve root compression on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT) imaging — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated. (Bono, 2011; Matz, 2009b; Tetreault, 2013); OR

When ALL of the following criteria are met (Bono, 2011: Nikolaidis, 2010):  

• Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy from ruptured disc, spondylosis, spinal instability, or deformity; AND
• Persistent or recurrent symptoms/pain with functional limitations that are unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment; AND  
• Documented failure of at least 6 consecutive weeks in the last 6 months of any 2 of the following physician-directed conservative treatments:
  • Analgesics, steroids, and/or NSAIDs
  • Structured program of physical therapy
  • Structured home exercise program prescribed by a physical therapist, chiropractic provider or physician
  • Epidural steroid injections and or selective nerve root block 
• Imaging studies confirm the presence of spinal cord or spinal nerve root compression (disc herniation or foraminal stenosis) at the level corresponding with the clinical findings (Bono, 2011). Imaging studies may include:
  • MRI (preferred study for assessing cervical spine soft tissue).
  • CT with or without myelography — indicated in patients in whom MRI is contraindicated; preferred for examining bony structures, or in patients presenting with clinical symptoms or signs inconsistent with MRI findings (e.g., foraminal compression not seen on MRI).

*Cervical spine decompression with fusion as first-line treatment without conservative care measures in the following clinical cases (Matz, 2009b; Tetreault, 2013; Zhu, 2013; White, 1987):

• As outlined above for myelopathy or progressive neurological deficit scenarios
• Significant spinal cord or nerve root compression due to tumor, infection or trauma
• Fracture or instability on radiographic films measuring:
  • Sagittal plane angulation of greater than 11 degrees at a single interspace or greater than 3.5mm anterior subluxation in association with radicular/cord dysfunction
  • Subluxation at the (C1) level of the atlantodental interval of more than 3 mm in an adult and 5 mm in a child

Not Recommended (Nikolaidis, 2010; van Middelkoop, 2012):

• In asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases of cervical spinal stenosis
• In cases of neck pain alone, without neurological deficits, and no evidence of significant spinal nerve root or cord compression on MRI or CT. See V. Cervical Fusion for Treatment of Axial Neck Pain Criteria  

Anterior Cervical Decompression With Fusion (ACDF) — Multiple Level

The following criteria must be met*:

• Positive clinical findings of myelopathy with evidence of progressive neurologic deficits consistent with worsening spinal cord compression — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (AA0S, 2013; Bono, 2011; Cunningham, 2010; Holly, 2009; Matz, 2009a; Matz, 2009b; Matz, 2009d; Matz, 2009e; Mummaneni, 2009; Tetreault, 2013; Yalamanchili, 2012; Zhu, 2013). Symptoms may include:
  • Upper extremity weakness.
  • Unsteady gait related to myelopathy/balance or generalized lower extremity weakness.
  • Disturbance with coordination.
  • Hyperreflexia.
  • Hoffmann sign.
  • Positive Babinski sign and or clonus.
• Progressive neurological deficit (motor deficit, bowel or bladder dysfunction) with corresponding evidence of spinal cord or nerve root compression on an MRI or CT scan images — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (Bono, 2011; Matz, 2009b; Tetreault, 2013).

When ALL of the following criteria are met (Bono, 2011; Nikolaidis, 2010):

• Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy due to ruptured disc, spondylosis, spinal instability, or deformity 
• Persistent or recurrent pain/symptoms with functional limitations that are unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment
• Documented failure of at least 6 consecutive weeks in the last 6 months of any 2 of the following physician-directed conservative treatments:
  • Analgesics, steroids, and/or NSAIDs
  • Structured program of physical therapy 
  • Structured home exercise program prescribed by a physical therapist, chiropractic provider or physician 
  • Epidural steroid injections and or selective nerve root block
• Imaging studies confirm the presence of spinal cord or spinal nerve root compression (disc herniation or foraminal stenosis) at multiple levels corresponding with the clinical findings. Imaging studies may include any of the following (Bono, 2011):
  • MRI (preferred study for assessing cervical spine soft tissue)
  • CT with or without myelography — indicated in patients in whom MRI is contraindicated; preferred for examining bony structures, or in patients presenting with clinical symptoms or signs inconsistent with MRI findings (e.g., foraminal compression not seen on MRI) 

Cervical spine decompression with fusion performed as first-line treatment without conservative care measures in the following clinical cases (Matz, 2009b; Tetreault, 2013; White, 1987; Zhu, 2013):

• As outlined above for myelopathy or progressive neurological deficit scenarios
• Significant spinal cord or nerve root compression due to tumor, infection or trauma
• Fracture or instability on radiographic films measuring:
  • Sagittal plane angulation of greater than 11 degrees at a single interspace or greater than 3.5mm anterior subluxation in association with radicular/cord dysfunction
  • Subluxation at the (C1) level of the atlantodental interval of more than 3 mm in an adult and 5 mm in a child

Not Recommended (Nikolaidis, 2010; Van Middelkoop, 2012):

• In asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases of cervical spinal stenosis
• In cases of neck pain alone, without neurological deficits, and no evidence of significant spinal nerve root or cord compression on MRI or CT. See V. Cervical Fusion for Treatment of Axial Neck Pain Criteria. 

Cervical Posterior Decompression With Fusion — Single Level

The following criteria must be met*:

• Positive clinical findings of myelopathy with evidence of progressive neurologic deficits consistent with worsening spinal cord compression — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (AA0S, 2013; Cunningham, 2010; Fehlings, 2013; Holly, 2009; Matz, 2009d; Mummaneni, 2009; Tetreault, 2013; Yalamanchili, 2012; Zhu, 2013).
• Symptoms may include:
  • Upper extremity weakness.
  • Unsteady gait related to myelopathy/balance or generalized lower extremity weakness.
  • Disturbance with coordination.
  • Hyperreflexia.
  • Hoffmann sign.
  • Positive Babinski sign and/or clonus.
• Progressive neurological deficit (motor deficit, bowel or bladder dysfunction) with corresponding evidence of spinal cord or nerve root compression on an MRI or CT scan images — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (Bono, 2011; Matz, 2009b; Tetreault, 2013).

When ALL of the following criteria are met (Bono, 2011; Nikolaidis, 2010):  

• Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy from ruptured disc, spondylosis, spinal instability, or deformity
• Persistent or recurrent symptoms/pain with functional limitations that are unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment
• Documented failure of at least 6 consecutive weeks in the last 6 months of any 2 of the following physician-directed conservative treatments:
  • Analgesics, steroids, and/or NSAIDs
  • Structured program of physical therapy
  • Structured home exercise program prescribed by a physical therapist, chiropractic provider or physician
  • Epidural steroid injections and or selective nerve root block
• Imaging studies confirm the presence of spinal cord or spinal nerve root compression (disc herniation or foraminal stenosis) at single level corresponding with the clinical findings (Bono, 2011). Imaging studies may include:
  • MRI (preferred study for assessing cervical spine soft tissue).
  • CT with or without myelography — indicated in patients in whom MRI is contraindicated; preferred for examining bony structures, or in patients presenting with clinical symptoms or signs inconsistent with MRI findings (e.g., foraminal compression not seen on MRI).

Cervical spine decompression with fusion performed as first-line treatment without conservative care measures in the following clinical cases (Fehlings, 2013; Tetreault, 2013; White, 1987; Zhu, 2013):  

• As outlined above for myelopathy or progressive neurological deficit scenarios
• Significant spinal cord or nerve root compression due to tumor, infection or trauma
• Fracture or instability on radiographic films measuring:
  • Sagittal plane angulation of greater than 11 degrees at a single interspace or greater than 3.5mm anterior subluxation in association with radicular/cord dysfunction
  • Subluxation at the (C1) level of the atlantodental interval of more than 3 mm in an adult and 5 mm in a child

Not Recommended (Nikolaidis, 2010; Wang, 2011):

• In asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases of cervical spinal stenosis
• In cases of neck pain alone, without neurological deficits, and no evidence of significant spinal nerve root or cord compression on MRI or CT. See V. Cervical Fusion for Treatment of Axial Neck Pain Criteria. 　

Cervical Posterior Decompression with Fusion — Multiple Levels

The following criteria must be met*:

• Positive clinical findings of myelopathy with evidence of progressive neurologic deficits consistent with worsening spinal cord compression — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (AA0S, 2013; Cunningham, 2010; Fehlings, 2013; Holly, 2009; Matz, 2009d; Mummaneni, 2009; Tetreault, 2013; Yalamanchili, 2012; Zhu, 2013).
• Symptoms may include:
  • Upper extremity weakness.
  • Unsteady gait related to myelopathy/balance or generalized lower extremity weakness.
  • Disturbance with coordination.
  • Hyperreflexia.
  • Hoffmann sign.
  • Positive Babinski sign and/or clonus. 
• Progressive neurological deficit (motor deficit, bowel or bladder dysfunction) with corresponding evidence of spinal cord or nerve root compression on an MRI or CT scan images — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (Bono, 2011; Matz, 2009b; Tetreault, 2013)

When ALL of the following criteria are met (Bono, 2011; Nikolaidis, 2010):

• Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy from ruptured disc, spondylosis, spinal instability, or deformity
• Persistent or recurrent symptoms/pain with functional limitations that are unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment
• Documented failure of at least 6 consecutive weeks in the last 6 months of any 2 of the following physician-directed conservative treatments:
  • Analgesics, steroids, and/or NSAIDs
  • Structured program of physical therapy
  • Structured home exercise program prescribed by a physical therapist, chiropractic provider or physician
  • Epidural steroid injections and or facet injections /selective nerve root block
• Imaging studies indicate significant spinal cord or spinal nerve root compression at multiple levels corresponding with the clinical finding. Imaging studies may include (Bono, 2011): MRI (preferred study for assessing cervical spine soft tissue)
• CT with or without myelography — indicated in patients in whom MRI is contraindicated; preferred for examining bony structures, or in patients presenting with clinical symptoms or signs inconsistent with MRI findings (e.g., foraminal compression not seen on MRI)

*Cervical spine decompression with fusion performed as first-line treatment without conservative care measures in the following clinical cases (Fehlings, 2013; Tetreault, 2013; White, 1987; Zhu, 2013):

• As outlined above for myelopathy or progressive neurological deficit scenarios
• Significant spinal cord or nerve root compression due to tumor, infection or trauma  
• Fracture or instability on radiographic films measuring:
  • Sagittal plane angulation of greater than 11 degrees at a single interspace or greater than 3.5mm anterior subluxation in association with radicular/cord dysfunction
  • Subluxation at the (C1) level of the atlantodental interval of more than 3 mm in an adult and 5 mm in a child 　

Not Recommended (Nikolaidis, 2010; Wang, 2011):

• In asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases of cervical spinal stenosis
• In cases of neck pain alone, without neurological deficits, and no evidence of significant spinal nerve root or cord compression on MRI or CT. See: Cervical Fusion for Treatment of Axial Neck Pain Criteria

Cervical Fusion for Treatment of Axial Neck Pain

In patients with non-radicular cervical pain for whom fusion is being considered, ALL of the following criteria must be met (Riew, 2010):  

• Improvement of the symptoms has failed or plateaued, and the residual symptoms of pain and functional disability are unacceptable at the end of 6 to 12 consecutive months of appropriate, active treatment, or at the end of longer duration of non-operative programs for debilitated patients with complex problems [NOTE: Mere passage of time with poorly guided treatment is not considered an active treatment program]
• All pain generators are adequately defined and treated
• All physical medicine and manual therapy interventions are completed  
• X-ray, MRI, or CT demonstrating disc pathology or spinal instability  
• Spine pathology limited to one or two levels unless other complicating factors are involved  
• Psychosocial evaluation for confounding issues addressed

NOTE: The effectiveness of three-level or greater cervical fusion for non-radicular pain has not been established (Van Middelkoop, 2012).

Cervical Posterior Decompression

The following criteria must be met*:

• Positive clinical findings of myelopathy with evidence of progressive neurologic deficits consistent with worsening spinal cord compression — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (AA0S, 2013; Bono, 2011; Heary, 2009; Mummaneni, 2009; Ryken, 2009; Tetreault, 2013; Wang, 2013; Yalamanchili, 2012; Zhu, 2013). Symptoms may include:
  • Upper extremity weakness.
  • Unsteady gait related to myelopathy/balance or generalized lower extremity weakness.
  • Disturbance with coordination.
  • Hyperreflexia.
  • Hoffmann sign.
  • Positive Babinski sign and / or clonus.
• Progressive neurological deficit (motor deficit, bowel or bladder dysfunction) with corresponding evidence of spinal cord or nerve root compression on an MRI or CT scan images — immediate surgical evaluation is indicated (Tetreault, 2013; Wang, 2013).

When ALL of the following criteria are met (Bono, 2011):

• Cervical radiculopathy from ruptured disc, spondylosis, or deformity
• Persistent or recurrent symptoms/pain with functional limitations that are unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment
• Documented failure of at least 6 consecutive weeks in the last 6 months of any 2 of the following physician-directed conservative treatments:
  • Analgesics, steroids, and/or NSAIDs
  • Structured program of physical therapy
  • Structured home exercise program prescribed by a physical therapist, chiropractic provider or physician　
  • Epidural steroid injections and or facet injections /selective nerve root block
• Imaging studies confirm the presence of spinal cord or spinal nerve root compression at the level(s) corresponding with the clinical findings (Bono, 2011; Sahai, 2019). Imaging studies may include any of the following:
  • MRI (preferred study for assessing cervical spine soft tissue)
  • CT with or without myelography— indicated in patients in whom MRI is contraindicated; preferred for examining bony structures, or in patients presenting with clinical symptoms or signs inconsistent with MRI findings (e.g., foraminal compression not seen on MRI)

Cervical decompression performed as first-line treatment without conservative care in the following clinical cases (Ryken, 2009; Tetreault, 2013; Wang, 2013; Zhu, 2013):

• As outlined above for myelopathy or progressive neurological deficit scenarios
• Spinal cord or nerve root compression due to tumor, infection or trauma

Not Recommended (Nikolaidis, 2010; Wang, 2011)

• In asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases
• In cases of neck pain alone, without neurological deficits and abnormal imaging findings. See E. Cervical Fusion for Treatment of Axial Neck Pain Criteria
• In patients with kyphosis or at risk for development of postoperative kyphosis

Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement (Single or Two Level)

Indications for cervical artificial disc replacement are as follows (Bono, 2011; Cheng, 2009; Davis, 2015; Gornet, 2019; Lavelle, 2019; Matz, 2009e):

• Skeletally mature patient
• Patient has intractable radiculopathy caused by one or two level disease (either herniated disc or spondolytic osteophyte) located at C3-C7
• Persistent or recurrent symptoms/pain with functional limitations that are unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment
• Documented failure of at least 6 consecutive weeks in the last 6 months of any 2 of the following physician-directed conservative treatments:
  • Analgesics, steroids, and/or NSAIDs
  • Structured program of physical therapy
  • Structured home exercise program prescribed by a physical therapist, chiropractic provider or physician
  • Epidural steroid injections and or facet injections /selective nerve root block
• Imaging studies confirm the presence of compression at the level(s) corresponding with the clinical findings (MRI or CT)
• Use of an FDA-approved prosthetic intervertebral discs

Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement is NOT indicated when any of the following clinical scenarios exists (Davis, 2015):

• Symptomatic multiple level disease affecting 3 or more levels
• Infection (at site of implantation or systemic)
• Osteoporosis or osteopenia
• Instability
  • Translation greater than 3mm difference between lateral flexion-extension views at the symptomatic levels;
  • 11 degrees of angular difference between lateral flexion-extension views at the symptomatic levels 
• Sensitivity or allergy to implant materials
• Severe spondylosis defined as (Davis, 2015):
  • > 50% disc height loss compared to minimally or non-degenerated levels
  • Bridging osteophytes
  • Absence of motion on lateral flexion-extension views at the symptomatic site
• Severe facet arthropathy
• Ankylosing spondylitis
• Rheumatoid arthritis
• Previous fracture with anatomical deformity
• Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)
• Active cervical spine malignancy

Cervical Fusion Without Decompression

Cervical fusion without decompression will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Atraumatic instability due to Down Syndrome-related spinal deformity, rheumatoid arthritis, or basilar invagination are uncommon, but may require cervical fusion (Trumees, 2017).  

Cervical Anterior Decompression (Without Fusion)

All requests for anterior decompression without fusion will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis (Bono, 2011; Botelho, 2012; Gebremariam, 2012; Matz, 2009a; Matz, 2009e).

References 

1. Park DK, Jenne JW, Bode KS, Throckmorton TW, Fischer SJ, Jenis LG. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Surgical Treatment Options. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Updated January 2022. Accessed February 7, 2022.
2. Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J. Jan 2011;11(1):64-72. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.023
3. Cunningham MR, Hershman S, Bendo J. Systematic review of cohort studies comparing surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Mar 1 2010;35(5):537-43. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b204cc
4. Holly LT, Matz PG, Anderson PA, et al. Clinical prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Aug 2009;11(2):112-8. doi:10.3171/2009.1.Spine08718
5. Matz PG, Holly LT, Groff MW, et al. Indications for anterior cervical decompression for the treatment of cervical degenerative radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Aug 2009;11(2):174-82. doi:10.3171/2009.3.Spine08720
6. Matz PG, Holly LT, Mummaneni PV, et al. Anterior cervical surgery for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Aug 2009;11(2):170-3. doi:10.3171/2009.3.Spine08724
7. Matz PG, Anderson PA, Holly LT, et al. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Aug 2009;11(2):104-11. doi:10.3171/2009.1.Spine08716
8. Matz PG, Ryken TC, Groff MW, et al. Techniques for anterior cervical decompression for radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Aug 2009;11(2):183-97. doi:10.3171/2009.2.Spine08721
9. Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, et al. Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Aug 2009;11(2):130-41. doi:10.3171/2009.3.Spine08728
10. Tetreault LA, Karpova A, Fehlings MG. Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review. Eur Spine J. Apr 2015;24 Suppl 2:236-51. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2658-z
11. Zhu B, Xu Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Dang G. Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. Jul 2013;22(7):1583-93. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2817-2
12. Luyao H, Xiaoxiao Y, Tianxiao F, Yuandong L, Ping W. Management of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Systematic review. Global Spine J. Oct 2022;12(8):1912-1924. doi:10.1177/21925682221075290
13. Xu Y, Chen F, Wang Y, Zhang J, Hu J. Surgical approaches and outcomes for cervical myelopathy with increased signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. Jul 18 2019;14(1):224. doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1265-z
14. Guo S, Lin T, Wu R, Wang Z, Chen G, Liu W. The Pre-Operative Duration of Symptoms: The Most Important Predictor of Post-Operative Efficacy in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Brain Sci. Aug 17 2022;12(8)doi:10.3390/brainsci12081088
15. Nunna RS, Khalid S, Chiu RG, et al. Anterior vs Posterior Approach in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Nationwide Propensity-Matched Analysis of Complications, Outcomes, and Narcotic Use. Int J Spine Surg. Feb 2022;16(1):88-94. doi:10.14444/8198
16. Kwok SSS, Cheung JPY. Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. Dec 8 2020;21(1):823. doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03830-0
17. Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Statham PF. Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 20 2010;2010(1):Cd001466. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001466.pub3
18. White AA, 3rd, Panjabi MM. Update on the evaluation of instability of the lower cervical spine. Instr Course Lect. 1987;36:513-20.
19. Spitnale MJ, Grabowski G. Classification in Brief: Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and Severity Score System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Oct 2020;478(10):2390-2398. doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001463
20. van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Ostelo R, et al. No additional value of fusion techniques on anterior discectomy for neck pain: a systematic review. Pain. Nov 2012;153(11):2167-2173. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.021
21. Audat ZA, Fawareh MD, Radydeh AM, et al. Anterior versus posterior approach to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, clinical and radiological results with long period of follow-up. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118766199. doi:10.1177/2050312118766199
22. Wang SJ, Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Axial pain after posterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. Feb 2011;20(2):185-94. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1600-x
23. Chan AK, Shaffrey CI, Gottfried ON, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better? J Neurosurg Spine. Jan 1 2023;38(1):42-55. doi:10.3171/2022.6.Spine22110
24. Riew KD, Ecker E, Dettori JR. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the management of axial neck pain in the absence of radiculopathy or myelopathy. Evid Based Spine Care J. Dec 2010;1(3):45-50. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1267067
25. Heary RF, Ryken TC, Matz PG, et al. Cervical laminoforaminotomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. Aug 2009;11(2):198-202. doi:10.3171/2009.2.Spine08722
26. Wang TY, Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after initial posterior cervical foraminotomy. Spine J. May 1 2015;15(5):971-6. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.042
27. Revesz DF, Charalampidis A, Gerdhem P. Effectiveness of laminectomy with fusion and laminectomy alone in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. May 2022;31(5):1300-1308. doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07159-1
28. Sahai N, Changoor S, Dunn CJ, et al. Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Alternative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Dec 15 2019;44(24):1731-1739. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000003156
29. Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, et al. Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. Jun 21 2019:1-11. doi:10.3171/2019.4.Spine19157
30. Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, Florman JE. Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement With the BRYAN Cervical Disc: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). May 1 2019;44(9):601-608. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002907
31. Eseonu K, Laurent E, Bishi H, Raja H, Ravi K, Dannawi Z. A Retrospective Comparative Study of Long-Term Outcomes Following Cervical Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Cureus. Dec 2022;14(12):e32399. doi:10.7759/cureus.32399
32. Truumees E, Prather H. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Spine 5. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2017:493-497.
33. Donk RD, Verbeek ALM, Verhagen WIM, Groenewoud H, Hosman AJF, Bartels R. What's the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183603. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183603
34. Badiee RK, Mayer R, Pennicooke B, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Tan LA. Complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion: a review of incidence, risk factors, and prevention strategies. J Spine Surg. Mar 2020;6(1):323-333. doi:10.21037/jss.2019.11.01
35. Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Côté P, Arnold P, Fehlings MG. A Clinical Prediction Rule for Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of an International Prospective Multicenter Data Set of 757 Subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 16 2015;97(24):2038-46. doi:10.2106/jbjs.O.00189
36. Jackson KL, 2nd, Devine JG. The Effects of Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Global Spine J. Nov 2016;6(7):695-701. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1571285
37. Kusin DJ, Ahn UM, Ahn NU. The Effect of Smoking on Spinal Cord Healing Following Surgical Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Sep 15 2015;40(18):1391-6. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000001014
38. Olsson EC, Jobson M, Lim MR. Risk factors for persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Orthopedics. Apr 2015;38(4):e319-23. doi:10.3928/01477447-20150402-61
39. Rajaee SS, Kanim LE, Bae HW. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: patient characteristics and complications. Bone Joint J. Jun 2014;96-b(6):807-16. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.96b6.31149
40. Yuan H, Yu H, Liu L, Zheng B, Wang L, Wang H. Risk Factors for Predicting Increased Surgical Drain Output in Patients After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion. World Neurosurg. Aug 2022;164:e980-e991. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.075
41. Sonntag VK, Klara P. Controversy in spine care. Is fusion necessary after anterior cervical discectomy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). May 1 1996;21(9):1111-3. doi:10.1097/00007632-199605010-00025
42. Dowd GC, Wirth FP. Anterior cervical discectomy: is fusion necessary? J Neurosurg. Jan 1999;90(1 Suppl):8-12. doi:10.3171/spi.1999.90.1.0008
43. Denaro V, Di Martino A. Cervical spine surgery: an historical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Mar 2011;469(3):639-48. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1752-3
44. Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Jun 15 2013;38(14):1226-32. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828be75d

Additional Information
A comprehensive assimilation of factors should lead to a specific diagnosis with positive identification of the pathologic condition(s).

• Early intervention may be required in acute incapacitating pain or in the presence of progressive neurological deficits.
• Operative treatment is indicated when the natural history of surgically treated lesions is better than the natural history for non-operatively treated lesions.
• Patients may present with localized pain or severe pain in combination with numbness, extremity weakness, loss of coordination, gait issues, or bowel and bladder complaints. Nonoperative treatment continues to play an important role in the care of patients with degenerative cervical spine disorders. If these symptoms progress to neurological deficits, from corresponding spinal cord or nerve root compression, than surgical intervention may be warranted.
• All patients being considered for surgical intervention should first undergo a comprehensive neuromusculoskeletal examination to identify those pain generators that may either respond to non-surgical techniques, or may be refractory to surgical intervention.
• In situations requiring the possible need for operation, a second opinion may be necessary. Psychological evaluation is strongly encouraged when surgery is being performed for isolated axial pain to determine if the patient will likely benefit from the treatment.
• It is imperative for the clinician to rule out non-physiologic modifiers of pain presentation, or non-operative conditions mimicking radiculopathy, myelopathy or spinal instability (peripheral compressive neuropathy, chronic soft tissue injuries, and psychological conditions), prior to consideration of elective surgical intervention. Significant depression or psychiatric disorder may be a reason for denial as risk of failure is elevated.

Degenerative cervical spine disorders, while often benign and episodic in nature, can become debilitating, resulting in axial pain and neurological damage to the spinal cord. Compression on the nerve root and / or spinal cord may be caused by (1) a herniated disc with or without extrusion of disc fragments and/or (2) degenerative cervical spondylosis.

Anterior Approaches — Additional Information:

• Anterior surgical approaches to cervical spine decompression emerged in the 1950s in response to technical limitations experienced with posterior approaches, including restricted access to and exposure of midline bony spurs and disc fragments.
• The first reports in the literature describe anterior cervical discectomy combined with a spinal fusion procedure (ACDF). Fusion was added to address concerns about potential for loss of spinal stability and disc space height, leading to late postoperative complications such as kyphosis and radicular pain (Sonntag and Klara, 1996; Dowd and Wirth, 1999; Matz et al., 2009a; Matz et al., 2009b; Denaro and Di Martino, 2011; Botelho et al., 2012; van Middelkoop et al., 2012).
• Anterior cervical fusion (ACF) accounted for approximately 80% of cervical spine procedures performed in the United States between 2002 and 2009, while posterior cervical fusion (PCF) accounted for 8.5% of these procedures (Oglesby et al., 2013).
• Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) – removal of all or part of a herniated or ruptured disc or spondolytic bony spur to alleviate pressure on the nerve roots or on the spinal cord in patients with symptomatic radiculopathy. Discectomy is most often combined with fusion to stabilize the spine.

Posterior Approaches
Laminectomy — Removal of the bone between the spinal process and facet pedicle junction to expose the neural elements of the spine’ this allows for the inspection of the spinal canal, identification and removal of pathological tissue, and decompression of the cord and roots.

Laminoplasty — The opening of the lamina to enlarge the spinal canal. There are several laminoplasty techniques; all aim to alleviate cord compression by reconstructing the spinal canal. Laminoplasty is commonly performed to decompress the spinal cord in patients with degenerative spinal stenosis.

Laminoforaminotomy (also known as posterior discectomy) — The creation of a small window in the lamina to facilitate removal of arthritic bone spurs and herniated disc material pressing on the nerve root as it exits through the foramen. The procedure widens the opening of the foramen so that the nerve exits without being compressed.

Coding Section 

Code	Number	Description
CPT	0092T	Total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, including discectomy with end plate preparation (includes osteophytectomy for nerve root or spinal cord decompression and microdissection), each additional interspace, cervical (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) (code deleted 12/31/14)
	0095T	Removal of total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, each additional interspace, cervical (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	0098T	Revision including replacement of total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, each additional interspace, cervical (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	0375T	Total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, including  discectomy with end plate preparation (includes osteophytectomy for nerve root or spinal cord decompression and microdissection), cervical, three or more levels  (new code 01/01/15)
	20939 (effective 1/1/2018)	Bone marrow aspiration for bone grafting, spine surgery only, through separate skin or fascial incision (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	22548	Arthrodesis, anterior transoral or extraoral technique, clivus-C1-C2 (atlas-axis), with or without excision of odontoid process
	22551	Arthrodesis, anterior interbody, including disc space preparation, discectomy, osteophytectomy and decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve roots; cervical below C2
	22552	Arthrodesis, anterior interbody, including disc space preparation, discectomy, osteophytectomy and decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve roots; cervical below C2, each additional interspace (List separately in addition to code for separate procedure)
	22554	Arthrodesis, anterior interbody technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); cervical below C2
	22585	Arthrodesis, anterior interbody technique, including minimal discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression); each additional interspace (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	22590	Arthrodesis, posterior technique, craniocervical (occiput-C2)
	22595	Arthrodesis, posterior technique, atlas-axis (C1-C2)
	22600	Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; cervical below C2 segment
	22614	Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; each additional vertebral segment (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	22856	Total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, including discectomy with end plate preparation (includes osteophytectomy for nerve root or spinal cord decompression and microdissection); single interspace, cervical
	22858	Total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, including discectomy with end plate preparation (includes osteophytectomy for nerve root or spinal cord decompression and microdissection); second level, cervical (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) (new code 01/01/15)
	22861	Revision including replacement of total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, single interspace; cervical
	22862	Total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach
	22864	Removal of total disc arthroplasty (artificial disc), anterior approach, single interspace; cervical
	22865	Single Spinal Instrumentation procedures on the Spine (Vertebral Column)
	63001	Laminectomy with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy or discectomy (e.g., spinal stenosis), 1 or 2 vertebral segments; cervical
	63015	Laminectomy with exploration and/or decompression of spinal cord and/or cauda equina, without facetectomy, foraminotomy or discectomy (e.g., spinal stenosis), more than 2 vertebral segments; cervical
	63020	Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc; 1 interspace, cervical
	63035	Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc; each additional interspace, cervical or lumbar (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	63040	Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, re-exploration, single interspace; cervical
	63043	Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, reexploration, single interspace; each additional cervical interspace (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	63045	Laminectomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy (unilateral or bilateral with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root[s], [e.g., spinal or lateral recess stenosis]), single vertebral segment; cervical
	63048	Laminectomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy (unilateral or bilateral with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root[s], [e.g., spinal or lateral recess stenosis]), single vertebral segment; each additional segment, cervical, thoracic, or lumbar (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
	63050	Laminoplasty, cervical, with decompression of the spinal cord, 2 or more vertebral segments;
	63051	Laminoplasty, cervical, with decompression of the spinal cord, 2 or more vertebral segments; with reconstruction of the posterior bony elements (including the application of bridging bone graft and non-segmental fixation devices [eg, wire, suture, mini-plates], when performed)
	63075	Discectomy, anterior, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s), including osteophytectomy; cervical, single interspace
	63076	Discectomy, anterior, with decompression of spinal cord and/or nerve root(s), including osteophytectomy; cervical, each additional interspace (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
ICD-9 Diagnosis	722.0	Displacement of cervical intervertebral disc without myelopathy
	722.4	Degeneration of cervical intervertebral disc
ICD-9 Procedure	84.62	Insertion of total spinal disc prosthesis, cervical
	84.66	Revision or replacement of artificial spinal disc prosthesis, cervical
ICD-10-CM (effective 10/1/15)	M5020	Other cervical disc displacement, unspecified cervical region
	M5030	Other cervical disc degeneration, unspecified cervical region
ICD-10-PCS (effective 10/1/15)	0RR30JZ	Open replacement of cervical vertebral disc with synthetic substitute
	0RR50JZ	Open replacement of cervicothoracic vertebral disc with synthetic substitute
Type of Service
Place of Service

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive. 

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association technology assessment program (TEC) and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2024 Forward     

01/01/2024 NEW POLICY 

06/19/2024 Annual review. No changes to policy intent.